[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm EQ and postprocessing
- To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm EQ and postprocessing
- From: Jos Van Dyck <jos.van.dyck@xxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:45:12 +0100
- Comments: To: ARSCLIST@sun8.loc.gov
- In-reply-to: <139a01c5ed36$29f4e7a0$0c00a8c0@thetick>
- Message-id: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAHRga3jFKDlFmb/EUhW0gnrCgAAAEAAAAOkPcIkb4+dEogMjGbn3LZEBAAAAAA==@scarlet.be>
- Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcXtNzPrS8asthsmSwmsoOL7LA9wNQAAN+Lg
Eric Jacobs wrote:
>
>There are tricks to making the break inaudible on a stylus transfer.
>Choice of cartridge and EQ are critical, giving you options in post-
>processing that might not otherwise exist.
Could you elaborate on postprocessing and the impact of cartridges
and EQ settings for best 78rpm transfer?
Some recommend RIAA EQ (others say flat) and do correct EQ in software.
Other sources recommend a special EQ amp such as Elberg MD12:
<http://www.vadlyd.dk/English/RIAA_and_78_RPM_preamp.html>
Thanks,
Jos