Subject: Excel binding
I would like to offer several reflections concerning the problems Jan Merrill-Oldham encountered with Excel bindings. Since I have no experience with Excel bindings (is this the product of a specific bindery or a generic type of binding?) but much experience with a variety of bindings, including double fan adhesive bindings, these are general reflections applicable to a variety of bindings. A text block falls forward in its case not because of inadequate spine lining but because it has some place to fall. Tradition insists that hardbound, cased books have a square (the part of the case extending beyond the edges of the textblock) at the bottom of the book. This square puts distance between the textblock and the shelf on which the book sits. Gravity pulls the textblock toward the shelf thereby causing a deformation of the spine and the hinges. The addition of spine linings stiffens the spine and the hinge area by creating a laminated structure which resists this deformation. However, the same structure also resists the movement we expect in the spine when we use the book. There are two answers to this problem. We can modify the structure on the spine to give us the best compromise between shelf durability and useability or we can eliminate the squares at the bottom of the case, thereby eliminating the stress that caused the problem to begin with. Elimination of the squares is the easier of the two and produces a book whose condition on the shelf is relaxed rather than perpetually stressed. Such is already the normal state of our everyday paperback book. Though paperbacks have their own problems they do not fall out of their cases on the shelf nor does proper shelving lead to deformation of the spine and hinge areas. The "problem" Jan encountered with the book's opening so that the two parts of the block actually touch rather than the spine opening into an arc may or may not be a problem. Whether this creates an area of stress depends on the construction of the spine and the quality of the materials used. Traditional lining (super and kraft paper) creates a laminate on the spine that leverages the tension on the super when the book is opened. The more heavily the spine is lined the greater this tension. Should the spine of such a book be forced open into a severe inverted "V" either the super, the paper liner or the leaf attachment will be damaged. Usually the paper liner delaminates at the point of stress. On the other hand, if we use a single, strong, thin cloth liner with no additional layers we greatly reduce or eliminate the stress usually associated with an inverted "V" opening. What we have is a single cloth folded back on itself. The stress question becomes one of the cloth's fold endurance rather than its tensile strength. The primary tension on the joint would then be the unleveraged weight of the part of the textblock which hangs in suspension from the opposite part. This tension would be much less then the leveraged tension caused by a laminated spine. Such a thinly lined spine can produce a highly usable and durable book if it is properly cased. A proper case would provide for increased movement of the spine and allow the text block to rest on the shelf rather than hang from its case. The reflections above derive from experience and research in progress concerning book structures. I am currently examining book structures, the assumptions underlying these structures, and whether these assumptions should be re-evaluated in light of modern materials and methods. Hopefully, this research will achieve some sort of formal presentation in the future. Any suggestions, knowledge of similar or related research, ideas or questions would be appreciated. On the lighter side I close with the following tale illustrating my assumption that life as a book is a pain: The Agony and the Agony or Misery in the Stacks by Pete Jermann It was uncomfortable sitting on the shelf all day, day in and day out, year in and year out. Libra's shoulders tensed and her back ached. Oh, if she could just put her whole foot down she could relax. Rather she hung between her boards, reaching out with her foredge toe, hoping to take the tension from her shoulders, only to pull her back out of shape. How she longed to lie down and rest. Then one day a patron came for her services. Libra looked forward to a brief moment of comfort away from her prison. Instead the patron rudely grabbed her headcap and yanked her from the shelf. Her scream echoed in the silence, but did not penetrate it. The patron heard nothing. Her pain subsided, replaced by the assuring warmth of his hand embracing her spine, couching it and supporting it. Libra laid back and took joy in the experience. Her shoulders relaxed, her back eased back into its normal shape. The patron laid her on a table, where, at last, she found total repose. "This must be heaven," mused Libra. "My life should be like this." Ecstasy, however, is usually shortlived and Libra was no exception. The patron opened one board, exposing her endsheets to the air and the light. Her shoulder tightened and pulled on her flyleaf and title page. After searching her table of contents, the patron turned to chapter ten. Libra felt a searing pain in her spine as her paper liner compressed and her super pulled taut. Again she cried into the unhearing silence. The pain was relentless. The spine liner on her cloth case pushed out on her shoulders as her pages tried to lay flat. Her super, wanting nothing more than to go with her pages, was pulled tight by her case and pushed into high tension by her paper spine liner. The paper liner fought its own battle against creasing and delamination as it resisted the compression forced on it by Libra's super and pages. Her pages, wanting nothing more than to lie flat, pulled at her super, which fought her paper liner. Together they all pulled on her shoulders. Heaven became hell. Libra wished she was back on the shelf. Future installments: Libra Visits the Xerox Machine Libra Meets the Tape Mender Libra Becomes a Discard *** Conservation DistList Instance 4:54 Distributed: Friday, April 12, 1991 Message Id: cdl-4-54-004 ***Received on Friday, 5 April, 1991