Subject: Liquid-gate printing
This is in response to Bob Kosovsky's query re. the possibility of printing glass plate negatives using the liquid-gate technique. That is a process primarily used with motion picture film. I'm not sure about using it with still film, particularly with glass plate negatives. If there is any instability, or damage, existing in the emulsion layer (whether gelatin or collodion, a point I'll get back to in a moment) then there is the possibility that further separation from the glass support could occur. ... Re. the emulsion layer. Some confusion about collodion and nitrate was indicated in Bob's letter. While both are nitrated cellulose esters, the degree of nitration is somewhat different (Doug Nishimura could explain all of this really well. We were discussing it over the phone the other day.) Another point is that the collodion is the EMULSION layer on the wet-plate negatives. It is very, very thin, particularly in comparison to the cellulose nitrate layer which serves as the SUPPORT/BASE layer to what are known as nitrate (nitrate base) negatives. So the reference to 'glass plate negatives, some nitrate, is a bit misleading. Nitrate negatives are those on a cellulose nitrate base. Glass plate negatives, as the name implies, are on a glass support or base. The emulsion can be gelatin(e), often referred to as gelatin dry-plate or dry-plate negative (since this process enabled the photographer to work with a dry, ready-made plate to produce a negative), as opposed to the wet-plate collodion negatives, in which the photographer had to coat the glass plate with th emulsion, expose it and develop it within minutes -- while the emulsion was still wet -- in order to produce a negative. (This is rambling. I probably need an editor). To try to sum up a bit, here: while collodion and cellulose nitrate are very similar on the chemical, molecular level, their function and physical characteristics in these two types of photographic materials are somewhat different. Wet-plate collodion negatives don't have quite the same deterioration and preservation problems that nitrate-base negatives do. This probably isn't the sort of response that Bob was looking for, but I hope that some of this will be helpful. Check with Doug (@IPI) for further clarification on the chemistry. Some names of people that Bob might want to contact re. copying and duplicating glass plate negatives are listed below (sorry that they aren't on a computer network, or if so, I don't have an email address): Steve Puglia Nat'l. Archives in D.C. (202) 501-5370 Michael Hager Rochester, NY (716) 442-7343 Connie McCabe Washington, DC (202) 546-8631 Doug Munson Chicago Albumen Works Housatonic, MA (413) 274-6901 Hope this will be helpful - Best regards, Barbara (bbrown@utxvm) *** Conservation DistList Instance 5:3 Distributed: Saturday, July 1, 1991 Message Id: cdl-5-3-003 ***Received on Thursday, 30 May, 1991