Subject: Reagents on manuscripts
Here's something that might prove interesting to you. JM has given permission to propagate it. He had spoken some time back of the use of nut galls in making MSS legible. A classicist member of NOTRBCAT who had been fed that message by an acquaintance (not me) contended that that was a very wrongheaded view, that such had never occurred. Me, I don't know.--Ksw From: James Marchand <marchand [at] ux1__cso__uiuc__edu> Sender: ANSAXNET Discussion Forum <ANSAX-L [at] VNVM__BITNET> Subject: Reagents on manuscripts To: Kathryn Wright <LIBKAT [at] INDST__BITNET> Several people have challenged my statement that people still use, nay recommend reagents as an aid in reading manuscripts, and I do not blame them. This is such a barbaric practice that it seems to fit in another age, but I suppose it is with ages as with men, nemo sine crimine. Unfortunately, the studies I cite here are e pluribus: In special number 12 of Archives et bibliotheques de Belgique, Etudes concernant la Restauration d'archives, de livres et de manuscrits (Brussels: ABB, 1974), there are a number of articles which recommend the use of reagents, e.g.: O. Waechter, "Die chemische Verstaerkung verblasster Eisengallustinten," 209-222. He quotes M. G. Ouy from an earlier paper (I translate): "As far as chemical techniques are concerned, they are suspect if they are used in a careless manner, and it is not at all certain that we will be able to give them up totally." This is a translation of a translation. O. Waechter, "Fixierungsmoeglichkeiten fuer Eisengallus-tinten bei chemischen Instandsetzungsarbeiten," 223-234. O (with stroke). Wendelbo, "The Use of Enzymes for Restoration Purposes," 235-242. All of us need to take a firm stand against invasive techniques in all our studies, painting in runes, freshening up paintings, using chemicals on manuscripts, bulldozing as a method in archaeology, etc. It is difficult to yell ad fontes when there are no fontes left. Jim Marchand *** Conservation DistList Instance 5:11 Distributed: Friday, July 26, 1991 Message Id: cdl-5-11-003 ***Received on Tuesday, 16 July, 1991