Subject: Bleaching and redevelopment
This is a response to Michale McCormick's inquiry about "Restore", a bleach/redevelopment product. It was prepared with a great deal of technical assistance from Doug Nishimura, and will appear in more or less the same version in a forthcoming issues of the Society of Georgia Archivists' Newsletter. The short answer to Michael's question is NO, neither "Restore" nor other bleach/redevelopment products should be used on holdings of permanent value. Doug Nishimura, formerly of the National Archives of Canada and now at the Image Permanence Institute explains that while rebuilding an image may be theoretically possible for developed out papers, this process is not feasible for printed out papers. This distinction between processes reminds us that it is imperative to know the nature of the materials with which you are dealing prior to contemplating any type of "treatment." Roughly 8 years of research into bleach and redevelopment has been done at what is now called the Conservation Research Division at the National Archives of Canada. 'Bleaching' /redevelopment is described as "a very risky business." that is NOT recommended. Fading of developing-out prints occurs because of oxidation, as silver particles on filament bundles are converted from a silver metal into ions. These ions are mobile in gelatin and can drift from their originating filament. Ions may convert back to silver metal as colloidal silver or may bond with other chemicals in the gelatin to form insoluble and non-mobile silver salts. Doug points out that the laws of nature do not allow migrated silver to return exactly to its original location, BUT if enough of the filamentary bundle is present, and in close enough proximity to the migrating silver, reconsolidation is a THEORETICAL possibility. If the silver filaments have been severely broken (high degree of fading) or if the silver ions have migrated too far from the filament (mirroring and red spots) bleach and redevelopment will be ineffective. Because gelatin is sensitive to oxidants and alkalines in solution, bleaching or a combination of bleaching and redevelopment can literally strip off the image layer of the photo, permanently destroying the photographic image. Doug cautions that bleach/redevelopment rarely reforms the original size and shape of the silver filaments and therefore rarely recreates the darkness (density), contrast, and tone of the original image. His point raises serious ethical questions about altering artistic intent or intrinsic value of the photographic image. In addition, the stability of the photographic image may be altered as a result of this type of treatment. In general, it is best for the buyer to beware when thumbing through catalogs. From a preservation standpoint, many products can do much greater long term harm than good. As a rule, it is best to approach chemically irreversible treatments conservatively, exploring other non-intrusive options (such as proper housing and storage) first. While the Image Permanence Institute has not directly investigated "Restore," the Institute has studied a number of issued of direct relevance to the preservation community, and makes that information widely available through publication or inquiry. *** Conservation DistList Instance 5:14 Distributed: Friday, August 9, 1991 Message Id: cdl-5-14-003 ***Received on Friday, 9 August, 1991