Subject: Laser printer cartridges
The following discussion took place on JANITORS and is reposted here without the knowledge or consent of the authors. Date: 20 Nov 91 Sender: College and University Housekeeping Information <JANITORS [at] UKANVM__BITNET> From: Ralph Stuart <RMGTRBS [at] UVMADMIN__bitnet> Subject: Re: Laser Printer Toner Laser printer toner's major constituent is carbon black, which is "a finely divided form of carbon made from the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons." The TLV is 3.5 mg/m3, based on the need to prevent excessive dirtiness. This value applies only to commercial products, not to soots derived from combustion sources, which may contain coal tar pitch volatiles. It is the coal tar pitch volatiles which are considered carcinogens. The studies in the information I have found that carbon black is not carcinogenic. The information I am referring to is the documentation for TLV's put out by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 5th edition. The bottom line is that toner should be handled to contain the mess of the carbon black, but there is no evidence for cancer concern from exposure to it. Ralph Stuart Chemical Safety Coordinator University of Vermont RMGTRBS [at] UVMADMIN__UVM__EDU Date: 21 Nov 91 Sender: College and University Housekeeping Information <JANITORS [at] UKANVM__BITNET> From: Phil Endacott <SUPERVISOR [at] SWEEP__FO__UKANS__EDU> Subject: Toner Exposure from Laser Printers Here is another confirmation of Ralphs posted information. Phil--- ------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- Date: 21 Nov 91 From: Chuck Cooper <ccc [at] MAILHOST__PP__PDX__EDU> Subject: Toner Exposure from Laser Printers To: PHIL ENDACOTT <ENDACOTT [at] kuhub__cc__ukans__edu> Reviewing my MSDS's for our HP laser Jet printers I found: Principle Components: Styrene acrylate copolymer 55-65% by weight Iron oxide 30-40% Under health hazards: ACGIH TLV: 10 mg/m3 (nuisance dust) No carcinogenic potential. In the past, I have done some air sampling on dry copiers for styrene and found them to be negative. The MSDS I have seems to be for Canon products as well. Based on this, I don't think their is any hazard from dry toners except to your dry cleaning bill. Back in 1982 there was a wet copier made by Xerox that used a dispersant that was found to be a teratogen. This model was quickly discontinued. Possibly this is where the idea that toners were carcinogenic originated. Chuck Cooper, EH&S, Portland State University: ccc [at] pp__pdx__edu -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |*| PHIL ENDACOTT (PE38) |*| <ENDACOTT [at] KUHUB__CC__UKANS__EDU> |*| |*| FACILITIES OPERATIONS |*| <ENDACOTT [at] UKANVAX__BITNET> |*| |*| THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS |*| LAWRENCE, KS PH: 913-864-3204 |*| =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= *** Conservation DistList Instance 5:29 Distributed: Tuesday, November 26, 1991 Message Id: cdl-5-29-014 ***Received on Sunday, 24 November, 1991