Subject: Natural history specimen salvage
Check out the sidebar article on P. 30 of the March 1993 issue of Scientific American. It describes an article by physicist and science fiction writer Gregory Benford, who, in last November's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is advocating the flash-freezing of samples of biota from endangered habitats. Gregory calls the process an "emergency salvaging operation" rather than a species inventory. According to the SA article, "Labels on the samples would state only their place of origin. No effort would be made to identify or describe the specimens. 'The main thing," he says, 'is to get the data and process them as soon as possible.'" (WHAT data?) "Benford argues that there are not enough taxonomists to catalogue a broad sample from the endangered regions. Yet nonspecialists could easily be trained to collect and freeze specimens." Later on, after discussing the need for DNA samples, the article quotes Benford as saying that "at the urging of the National Science Foundation...he plans to organize a small conference later this year to discuss the idea." I don't know how much clout Dr. Benford has, but I don't think he understands either collections or sampling, not to mention data capture. It seems to me that we need to respond professionally to this if we don't want to be seen as a group of incipient freezer technicians. I support the concern over maintaining samples of biodiversity as well as biodiversity itself, but this does not seem to me to be the way to build up a useful and meaningful collection. I have not yet seen the Proceedings article. Comments appreciated. Sally Shelton *** Conservation DistList Instance 6:46 Distributed: Friday, February 19, 1993 Message Id: cdl-6-46-001 ***Received on Wednesday, 17 February, 1993