Subject: Smoke control
At NLS we are part way through a multi million pound programme to reduce the disaster risk in our Main Building. Most of the work is focused on fire prevention and control. A great deal of work has been done, and is ongoing, on matters such as the separation of human activity from collection areas, increasing the fire resistance of the building fabric, compartmentalization and fire detection. A sprinkler system is to be installed. We note with concern the results of recent tests in Canada which produced a terrifying quantity of smoke within a few minutes from a relatively small simulated library fire. As a result, we are aware of the need for smoke extraction. Smoke is as potentially damaging as the fire or the water used to extinguish it. However, without going into unnecessary detail, we are having difficulty in providing smoke extraction because of the architecture and detail of the building. The disruption and cost of providing this is likely to be enormous. While having some personal experience of smoke damage suffered in library fires, this has always been on material in public library fires which has been considered to be dispensable or replaceable and recovering the damaged material was not a priority. Since we are a Legal Deposit Library with responsibility for permanent retention we cannot take this view. May I ask if anyone has experience of: a. recovering smoke damaged library material b. whether recovery was partial or fully successful c. if recovery was successful, what method was used and what was the average unit cost? In my opinion, "chemical sponges" are only partially successful on book material and impossible to use on fragile or manuscript material. I am trying to measure the risk sustained if smoke extraction was not installed. Thank you in advance. John E McIntyre Head of Preservation National Library of Scotland Edinburgh *** Conservation DistList Instance 7:10 Distributed: Friday, July 9, 1993 Message Id: cdl-7-10-008 ***Received on Wednesday, 30 June, 1993