Subject: Integrated Pest Management
Note: this is intended as a very simple, I hope practical, initiation to the ideas of integrated pest management. In re the query about preventive fumigation of incoming gifts or other archival collection materials, I think it's a bad idea to use chemical fumigants or insecticides unless the situation presents a crisis that threatens rapid losses or refuses to succumb to more conservative methods. It's good instinct to worry about the reaction of metals, photos, textiles, etc. to both the chemicals that kill insects or mold and to the bases for application of the toxins. Most sophisticated collections-holding institutions use integrated pest management strategies (IPM), and there are simple ones that seem appropriate to your situation. The following suggestions are not comprehensive, but are practical and reasonably effective: 1. Examine material immediately to see if there's evidence of infestation (already done in this case). 2. If there's no evidence of bugs or active mold (live creatures, insect droppings, larvae or bodies, fuzzy growths), transfer materials to clean archival boxes for storage until you can process them. Throw the old boxes away unless they are archival-quality and you are absolutely certain they are clean (because your donor is another institution with excellent collections care practices). 3. If at all possible, isolate rehoused, incoming material in an isolation space away from other collections until processing. Such space should provide preservation conditions: cool, dry, clean, outfitted with shelving, etc., to discourage mold and insects. Reboxing is desirable because silverfish, roaches, and a variety of other collections pests love tight dark spaces--corrugated cardboard could have been invented by a committee of these bugs. The clean archival boxes can be used over and over *for this temporary holding use* as long as the contents and boxes continue free of evidence of insects or mold growth. Ideally, of course, incoming material should be processed (including any necessary surface cleaning) and rehoused in its permanent enclosures promptly. Realistically, processing may be delayed, and the interior of boxes should be inspected routinely at least every few weeks. A "tent" or "motel" type sticky trap can be placed on a side wall inside each box to improve the certainty of monitoring (obviously, in monitoring you would check the trap). 4. If there is evidence of insects, talk to a conservator by phone--you need more detail than it's practical to give in this forum. Vacuum materials thoroughly, vacuuming the objects themselves (assuming they are not deteriorated or fragile) through a nylon or other soft screen, using a high-filtration vacuum. Discard both filter and disposable bag outside the building or in a sealed container provided for food wastes and emptied daily. Freezing and oxygen deprivation are being used increasingly for insect extermination affecting collections materials. Mold can also be vacuumed, but dry damp materials thoroughly before cleaning and use a brush to sweep mold into the mouth of the nozzle or vacuum through a soft screen. Ethylene oxide (ETO) treatment is commercially available, but is little used these days because of its very high toxicity and poorly documented "half-life" in library and archives materials. ETO is a fungicide: it kills both live mold and spores. The next common fungistatin (that is, something that kills live mold but not dormant spores) is thymol. Thymol is also toxic to people, and there is some evidence that it causes yellowing in treated paper on exposure to UV. Orthophenol-phenol is another fungistatin for "home" use--again, it's toxic, and it doesn't kill dormant spores. Providing cool (below about 70 deg.), dry (below 50-55%) conditions with good air circulation will do all that thymol or opp will do unless you're dealing with a massive outbreak, and in the absence of good environment, mold will regenerate after treatment with those chemicals. As far as I know, freezing will not kill mold, although there is a rumor that vacuum freeze drying may be helpful. Talk to Mary-Lou Florian (604-385-8263) for an authoritative answer. 5. All collections need good environmental control. Combined with cleaning, restriction and removal of food (and insect attractors like pest carcasses and mold), a well-sealed building or storage spaces, and a good sticky-trap-based monitoring program, climate control greatly reduces the likelihood of infestations--bar the occasional accidental tourist. See a new publication, "Integrated Pest Management in Museum, Library, and Archival Facilities: A Step by Step Approach for the Design, Development, Implementation and Maintenance of an Integrated Pest Management Program," (James Harmon, 1993, Harmon Preservation Pest Management, P.O. Box 40262, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240, about $40.00) for a thorough review of issues and strategies. WAAC Newsletter has had some excellent papers on IPM, including Nancy Odegaard's "Insect Monitoring in Museums" (January 1991), Dale Kronkright's "Insect Traps in Conservation Surveys," (January 1991), and Daniel, Hanlon, and Maekawa, "Eradication of Insect Pests in Museums Using Nitrogen (September 1993). All are available on CoOL. Karen Motylewski Northeast Document Conservation Center 508-470-1010 *** Conservation DistList Instance 7:30 Distributed: Thursday, October 7, 1993 Message Id: cdl-7-30-001 ***Received on Monday, 4 October, 1993