Subject: Fire suppression systems
I've been recently hearing from a number of people that "dry pipe" fire suppression systems were not being recommended any more and that they were bad because they have been known to fail and not function. Well we recently had a meeting (about other things) with Bill Lull and we got side tracked onto fire suppression systems. I have to admit that I don't know much about them (can't be an expert in everything), but I learned some interesting things. There are apparently three types of systems that people have been calling "dry pipe". The first one is called a "Deluge" system. This one uses open sprinkler heads and empty piping in the storage area. At the first sign of fire, a valve is opened and the whole room gets soaked (hence the term "Deluge".) Bill pointed out that with this system, a cigarette in the wrong place could be disastrous. The second type is the real dry pipe system in which all sprinkler heads are sealed and the pipes are empty. Apparently there is also compressed air used to hold a flapper valve shut. Where there is fire, the sprinkler heads are opened (seals melted) and the flapper valve opens thus only the sprinklers in the area of the fire are open. Failure may result from loss of compressed air, but it only means that the sprinkler pipes fill up. Since the heads are sealed, nothing else happens. The third type is the type most often called dry pipe and it is the "Preaction System". In the Preaction system, there are fused or pneumatically sealed heads. The pipes are dry and the preaction valve must be opened to fill them. Apparently the system uses electronic detectors and valve control system. Smoke detectors are put in the storage area in overlapping zones with 2 detectors per zone. Apparently *BOTH* detectors must go off for the system to activate thus is one smoke detector is not functioning, neither is the sprinkler. This system also uses compressed air. Failure may occur if (a) the pipes are already filled with water, (b) there is a low pressure condition present (open fused heads, compressor failure, etc.) In addition, since the whole system is computer controlled, it must be verified that what the computer calls Alarm A really is Alarm A. (Hardware and software must agree.) Finally there must be a manual release that is easily accessible. Bill had stories of manual releases in the storage area (you have to walk through the fire to get to the manual release) and in locked maintenance rooms. One other cause of failure in these systems is from rust. They are apparently prone to building up rust inside. The fire marshals often require a demonstration to prove that the system is working (ie flooding the pipes.) The flooded pipes now contain a mixture of water and rust sludge that wanders back to the preaction valve and gums it up. >From what Bill said, it sounded like the preaction systems are the ones that are failing and not the true dry pipe systems. Although I'm a little worried about wet pipes in collections, Bill said that he has only seen leaks in wet pipe systems from frozen pipes. There was one case of a very slowly dripping elbow, but he said that it was easily fixed and posed not problem. There was also one case that he had seen in which the sprinkler heads were knocked off (causing a flood). This storage vault had a ramp to move materials in and out of a basement. The drop (false) ceiling was also sloped, but not quite as much as the ramp was (it was apparently not easy to see without actually measuring the floor to ceiling height at the top and bottom of the ramp.) Of course, one day a large object was being wheeled up the ramp (pushing in every ceiling panel along the way and) knocking off all the sprinkler heads above the ramp. Bill did not feel that sprinkler pipes were prone to leaking like (potable) water and sewer pipes were although I didn't find out why. I hope that I got everything right. Bill was talking and I was furiously scribbling down notes. -Doug Image Permanence Institute *** Conservation DistList Instance 7:35 Distributed: Saturday, October 23, 1993 Message Id: cdl-7-35-002 ***Received on Wednesday, 20 October, 1993