Subject: Mold
Mold questions probably compromise 10-15% of the 1500 questions NEDCC answers through field service each year. I just read a very thought-provoking paper by Mary-Lou Florian ("Conidial Fungi (Mould) Activity on Artifact Materials--A New Look at Prevention, Control, and Eradication," Preprints of the 10th Triennial Meeting, ICOM Committee for Conservation 1993, pp. 868-874 (avail. from Allen Press, Inc., FAX 913-843-1244, Lawrence, KS 66044). I also talked to Mary-Lou about questions that paper and her week-long course at the Campbell Center had raised for NEDCC staff. I absolve her of all responsibility for what I pass on, and refer any readers to the original paper, since I may have gotten things wrong, and Mary-Lou is impeccable about the information she provides. I did think, having done this for our staff, others might find it interesting. Comments and corrections are welcomed. A little-recognized and critical factor in mold outbreaks is the behavior of the "spore" equivalent (conidium) in the types of fungi that are most frequently found in conjunction with collections materials. This can be dormant due to the condition of the spore (endogenous or "constitutional" dormancy) or the environment (exogenous or environmentally-imposed dormancy). Exposure to temperatures between about 104-167 dg F; freezing; and exposure to chemicals commonly used in conservation treatment in *very low concentrations* (organic solvents, detergents, and others) can alter the endogenous conditions of the conidium in poorly understood ways, potentiating its activation *under favorable environmental conditions* for that form of mold. One of the most interesting parts of the paper for me was the discussion of the importance of moisture content of materials in precipitating or supporting mold growth. This appears to be more important even than RH--if the substrate contains enough water, and if it can pass through the substrate to the conidium (the nature of some materials produces a reduced rate of osmosis of water), and if there is a large outbreak of mold, the mold colony itself may store enough water to continue growth, even when RH is significantly reduced. Presumably that's an underlying reason wet material is so vulnerable to mold. 1. Alcohol and other organic solvents as activators: At about 10-2 M, which is in the ppm range, these can potentiate conidial growth. At the practical concentrations of lab treatments, these solvents are biocides, and will kill mold and conidia. Mary-Lou worries about contamination as a source of post-treatment mold potentiation. I assume if a sink or tray is inadequately flushed, and contained an alcohol-water mix, it would be possible to accidentally expose another object in treatment to the small concentration of solvent that would potentiate growth. 2. UV levels for fungi kill: Mary-Lou referred me to some "old" papers from Israel that document that levels of UV effective for mold eradication can cause substrate (paper?) damage. Apparently this is sufficiently well documented as to make UV an inappropriate approach, and I won't pursue it in the literature. 3. Can non-aqueous deacidification precipitate mold growth? In theory, because alkaline salts and solvents can activate conidia, and because some alkaline salts may enhance mold growth, yes. There is no clinical experience or literature that confirms this in the real world. It would be good to keep this in mind when tracking causes for mold outbreaks in client institutions or treated objects. 4. Temperature effects on fungi: Under dry conditions, temperature of about 98-99 deg. F appears to kill conidia. Slightly higher temperature (about 104-167 deg. F) can activate conidia and potentiate mold growth. This would suggest that in an active outbreak, if you could keep temperature between about 98-100 and dry out the object or space, you would kill mold rather than increase growth. The trick is that if the substrate on which it grows or the colony itself contains enough water, the 98 deg. temperature may not kill. Here again, nobody appears to have tried this for practical or experimental in situ mold control. I believe our normal recommendations to dry out under cool conditions with good air circulation in a room that prevents recirculation of mold spores throughout additional spaces remain sound. I always tell people with central/mechanical air circulation to block the uptake vents if they're working with mold, to reduce distribution of additional spores or conidia through the air handlers. 5. Protocols for treatment/treatment choices for mold: Clinical experience, whatever is known about the object's home environment, and common sense should dictate. There is insufficient research or experience to make recommendations. 6. Chitinase as an enzyme treatment for mold: This is an empirical recommendation based on microbiology research. Chitinase attacks the connection between the cell wall of mycelium and the cell wall of substrates (I think). Mary-Lou extrapolates that the enzyme would thus release mold, but notes that we don't actually know the locus of the pigments produced by mold in substrate structures. She says evaluating this would not be taxing--just basic microscopy--but apparently no one's done it. Chitinase treatment would be experimental, but based on the experience of microbiology might work well and might be preferable to chemical bleaching treatments. 7. Sterilization: Mary-Lou stresses the importance of sterilization of tools, materials, and work surfaces in conservation labs. Apparently starches are loaded with conidia, and adhesives should be sterilized and kept sterile; obviously so should implements used in their manufacture and application, and other tools and materials that come in contact with them. 8. Environmental control: This is still our fall-back position, and very important for a host of reasons, but given the difficulty and expense of excellent control, we have good reasons to explore alternative preventive and intervention strategies. If anyone has practical or experimental knowledge in any of the areas above, I'd very much appreciate hearing about it. Karen Motylewski Northeast Document Conservation Center 100 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 508-470-1010 *** Conservation DistList Instance 7:45 Distributed: Thursday, December 16, 1993 Message Id: cdl-7-45-009 ***Received on Thursday, 16 December, 1993