Subject: Relative Humidity/Temperature Meter
Geoffrey Brown's thoughtful response to Susan Hughes' query is closely related to one of my current projects. Over the past three years Roger Marin and I have been working in our spare time to develop an accurate but inexpensive solid state data logger. The major area of concern was the selection of an appropriate RH sensor. The one which we have selected is a capacitive sensor produced by Panametrics, called the MiniCap 2. It's advantages, to us, were stability (+/- 2% over 24 months), hysteresis (+/- 1% when ranged from 10% to 90% and back to 10%), with an operating temperature range of -40 to 180 degrees Centigrade, and it is unaffected by water condensate. Although the literature states that this sensor is "...immune to most reagent vapors...", it will be affected by highly polluted environments. In this event, the replacement cost of the sensor might be an inexpensive prod to testing for contaminants in storage or display areas. This logger will also log lux hours, an important consideration when particularly light sensitive artifacts are on display. People who will be in Nashville for the AIC conference next month can examine the logger at the Conservation Materials exhibit. Jack C. Thompson Thompson Conservation Lab *** Conservation DistList Instance 7:75 Distributed: Monday, April 18, 1994 Message Id: cdl-7-75-001 ***Received on Monday, 18 April, 1994