Subject: Book conservation and ethics
Mr. Campell raises an interesting question which I have long intended to discuss in this forum. For several years now, we at Columbia's Preservation Division have stopped using Filmoplast (and other expensive document repair tapes) for brittle and damaged materials to be microfilmed. Whereas the longstanding policy was to use these expensive brands of tape to "repair" volumes before filming, these items are typically in such poor condition that they are to be withdrawn after filming. We found it hard to justify using $20/box tape for volumes that were not going to be retained. Instead we use Highland 6200 Invisible Tape (a 3M product) for items selected for withdrawal; items to be retained are routed to our Conservation Lab for repair before filming. Using Filmoplast on books destined for withdrawal certainly qualifies as a "disproportionately elaborate and expensive treatment," and became a policy which we at Columbia could not see worthy of perpetuating. Lee Dirks Project Coordinator NEH Preservation Project Columbia University Libraries *** Conservation DistList Instance 7:78 Distributed: Wednesday, April 27, 1994 Message Id: cdl-7-78-006 ***Received on Tuesday, 26 April, 1994