Subject: Digital Audio Tape
Richard Pearce-Moses <iacrpm [at] asuvm__inre__asu__edu> writes >Aside from the general problems of magnetic media, is anyone aware of >particular problems or benefits of digital audio over analog audio for >tape recordings? DAT was originally designed for the consumer market and for various reasons made its way into professional use. There are several advantages to DAT technology: * It is a standardized digital medium. * Any place on the tape can be numbered for quick reference (the code is imbedded on the tape). * Some players have a shuttle wheel to allow playback at various speeds (forwards and backwards) while maintaining proper pitch; in other words one can play a tape at half-speed while maintaining the original recorded pitch. This can be very useful for the comprehension of difficult to understand material. * The DATs can hold up to two hours of material in a small cassette (including case roughly 3 1/8" by 2 1/4" by 5/8"). * Time base errors (tape not running at steady speed) can be corrected by buffering (information loaded into memory chips and played-back at a regular rate). * DATs can be copied in the digital domain, bypassing the Digital to Analog and Analog to Digital converters for better quality copies. * There are powerful error correction circuits built into the playback to compensate for some random errors due to dirty heads, tape dropouts, etc. * Because the information is recorded with some redundancy, certain errors can be corrected fully. The DAT player can rebuild the information. Unfortunately for long term storage purpose, I believe that these advantages are outweighed by the following disadvantages: * Because the information is recorded so densely, a small imperfection on the tape due to dust, physical damage or aging, can affect a large portion of the recorded material. * If an error is sufficiently large that the information cannot be rebuilt, the player will interpolate ("guess") what the information should be. If the error burst is too large to interpolate, then the signal is muted until the machine can find useable information. * Because DAT uses a rotary head to record and playback (like a VHS recorder) the tape is subjected to greater stress and wear than stationary head media (reel to reel tape, cassette, etc). * With any machine readable technology, one is at the mercy of the manufacturer for any repair to the equipment. Will the manufacturer still have parts in a few years or decades when, invariably, the technology becomes obsolete? Can the technology be rebuilt easily? * Because DATs cassettes are so small, security becomes an significant issue. * Though DAT is standardized, not all DAT players are created equal. For instance, there is a TV broadcast standard, yet there is considerable difference in picture quality between different television models. The periodical "Studio Sound and Broadcast Engineering" undertook a series of accelerated aging tests on various brands of DAT tapes. The results are fascinating. That article and other articles relating to DAT technology were republished by HHB (not surprisingly the manufacturer of the first-placed tape) in a single 18 page pamphlet. If you are considering DAT technology, it would be wise to read it. The pamphlet is available through: HHB Communications Ltd 73-75 Scrubs Lane London NW10 6QU UK 081-960-2144 Fax: 081-960-1160 Independent Audio 295 Forest Avenue, Suite 121 Portland, Maine 04101-2000 207-773-2424 Fax: 207-773-2422 Studer Revox 1947 Leslie Toronto, Ontario M3B 2M3 416-510-1347 Fax: 416-510-1294 Gilles St-Laurent Music Division National Library of Canada *** Conservation DistList Instance 7:84 Distributed: Sunday, May 22, 1994 Message Id: cdl-7-84-001 ***Received on Thursday, 19 May, 1994