Subject: Radiation and mold
Re: irradiation and mold Johanna Wellheiser gives a good review of the experience and the literature in "Nonchemical Treatment Processes for Disinfestation of Insects and Fungi in Library Collections," IFLA Publ. 60, Munich: G.K. Saur (1992), pp. 39-51. Essentially she confirms the information in Walter's not to your posting. Gamma radiation, which is commercially available for processing cosmetics, foodstuffs, and some other products, will kill mold. Increasing temperature, atmospheric oxygen, and moisture improve the fungicidal effectiveness. Spore-producing fungi are more resistant than other forms, and spores (conidia) can be quite resistant. We don't have enough experience with this application to know what constitutes appropriate protocol for limiting unintended damage to library materials, or what is a minimum effective dose. There is no residual fungistatic action, and materials must be cleaned after irradiation, with health precautions for workers. Most researchers appear to agree that irradiation sufficient to kill mold also produces cellulose (and presumably other molecular) deterioration. This may or may not be immediately observable as embrittlement, and accelerated aging in the long term is a risk to irradiated material. All in all, it sounds like a bad idea except in very special circumstances. The best known (and may the only) use of radiation for disinfestation in this country seems to have been at Johns Hopkins medial library in 1982. They had about 300 cubic feet of horrifically contaminated material (bugs, mold, dead animals, etc.) treated. The ex-USSR apparently has more experience, but their research reports are often skimpy or hard to evaluate by U.S. standards. Karen Motylewski Northeast Document Conservation Center Andover, MA 01810 508-470-1010 *** Conservation DistList Instance 8:8 Distributed: Tuesday, July 19, 1994 Message Id: cdl-8-8-006 ***Received on Monday, 18 July, 1994