Subject: Mold health hazards
I'd like to posit the argument that sensitivity to mold spores is a red herring, akin to postulating that of two folks drinking Nippon SunRises (Tequila & Saki in Beer), the one with the lower tolerance to vile mixtures of alcohol has to be protected when in fact both have consumed the devil's brew. ...Or, if the argument requires more color, that we should protect canaries in coal mines but not necessarily the miners when both breathe the same air, if not share the same breath. Sensitive people, like the remaining population, breath in mold spores. What is sensitivity anyway? Certainly it has something to do with factors of exposure like duration and concentration or species of spore. And, it must have something to do with allergic and other bodily reactions to the breathed in spore(s). One of the possible reactions is a relatively minor but very annoying condition which my physician refers to colloquially as "pearl formation in the lungs"; after introduction of the spore, it is apparently enveloped by tissue (of some sort) much as a grain of sand is encased in an oyster's shell and for apparently similar reasons. Apparently, "established pearls" can be detected by x-ray. For this reason and fear of more harmful effects, I believe that non-toxic particle mask should be required protection when responding to mold infections in library stacks where the concentration of spores is likely to be high and ventilation is likely to be poor as indicated by bloom. Erich J. Kesse Preservation Office University of Florida Libraries 904-392-6962 Fax: 904-392-7251 *** Conservation DistList Instance 8:22 Distributed: Wednesday, September 28, 1994 Message Id: cdl-8-22-002 ***Received on Friday, 23 September, 1994