Subject: Smithsonian press release
In my humble opinion: The statement by CAL regarding relaxed guidelines for relative humidity control is a bold political statement. As presented at IIC in Ottawa the CAL's scientific research is largely confirming research with new conclusions. Its presentation as a press release is driven by new social and political realities. For decades our leading institutions had maintained a philosophy of 'preservation at all costs'. In the domain of environmental parameters this led to a kind of intramural competition among those institutions. Competing definitions for the 'most-ideal ideal' in relative humidity control were generated by dueling laboratories. Ultimately very difficult or impossible to maintain standards were developed. Then came the crush of reduced funding. The new guidelines represent a political escape from seeking the 'most-ideal ideal'. They put new clothes on a philosophy that most medium and small institutions had been forced to follow all along. This philosophy may be described as 'conserve cost effectively through balanced compromise'. With its new research showing that the guidelines can be relaxed from absurd standards, the CAL scientists and their institutions are able to maintain a position of leadership within the field while backing away from the conundrum of the ideal. But in many cases medium and small museums and libraries have been able to maintain, through balanced compromise, better conditions than those extremes now postulated as acceptable by CAL scientists. I would call for reticence in adopting some of this new tolerance. It should be taken as a document repudiating the concept of the 'most ideal ideal'. It should not be used to undermine the controls achieved by those who 'conserve cost effectively through balanced compromise'. Dennis Piechota Object and Textile Conservation Arlington, Massachusetts *** Conservation DistList Instance 8:24 Distributed: Sunday, October 2, 1994 Message Id: cdl-8-24-001 ***Received on Saturday, 1 October, 1994