Subject: Water purification
Cal Hermann is a chemist working in the Pulp and Paper Laboratory, Richmond Field Station, University of California. Hermann is formerly of the Water Technology Center and has worked on water treatments. As a result of submissions to the distribution by both Geoffrey Brown and myself, Hermann has added several valuable comments. We all agree that distilled water has limitations. CH and GB also agree that deionizing cartridges are more convenient but CH cautions that, "They become contaminated by degradation products if not used for 6 month or so (in that case: flush out 10 liters or so)." GB remarked about high installation costs for reverse osmosis but CH comments that costs are associated with the quantities of water needed. One may be talking about hundreds of dollars for maintenance and not thousands or more. My feeling is that If the proposed conservation laboratory is unable to estimate its water demand the tendency will be to overbuild. This is difficult because the number of people and space requirements will influence the decision. So will the treatment philosophy of the lab and the amount of time spent on phase box construction or other non-washing activities. This might be best handled by asking other labs in order to set the range of requirements. Cal Hermann further noted that many deionizers have test lights on the top and Millipore (TM) and some other reverse osmosis systems come with a meter built-in. As a another option small conductivity meters should be adequate to check the reliability of the installation. To address the problem of wasted water from RO, it is very possible to divert it for non-critical purposes. Concerning paper pH, if the main function is to spot unstable acidic paper, the narrow-range paper indicator strips could be adequate. Jim Druzik *** Conservation DistList Instance 8:38 Distributed: Sunday, November 20, 1994 Message Id: cdl-8-38-008 ***Received on Thursday, 17 November, 1994