Subject: VPD papers
The ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc.;) Threshold Limit Value for cyclohexylamine in 1994 is 10 parts per million, the same as for benzene, chloroform, hydrogen cyanide and naphthalene. Maybe the ACGIH is wrong, but we do not *know* that. A good principle to follow, when you do not know whether something is harmless, is to hold off until it has been adequately investigated. In my opinion, VPD sheets have not been adequately investigated. I have used VPD sheets. On March 24, 1977, I wrote to NIOSH in Rockville, MD, saying, in part, "I have had a headache for a week now, ever since I last handled the stuff, and I never get headaches unless I am sick." I asked for advice, and they sent me three inconclusive journal articles. Nobody followed up because nobody was doing a study on the topic. The absence of evidence to the contrary is not the same as an endorsement. I do want to make it clear that cyclohexylamine is not the same as cyclohexylamine carbonate (CHC). The ACGIH does not list the carbonate. But in the 1970 evaluation of the carbonate (Restaurator, v. 1), it is stated on p. 160 that "CHC hydrolyzes to cyclohexylamine, an odorous and toxic chemical, on exposure to moist air." Anyone who breathes the vapor would be moistening it by breathing it in. Maybe the authors were mistaken, and maybe there is evidence on the other side, but this is enough evidence to make me want to be on the cautious side. *** Conservation DistList Instance 8:39 Distributed: Wednesday, November 23, 1994 Message Id: cdl-8-39-002 ***Received on Monday, 21 November, 1994