Subject: Photos for microfilming book needed
I am working under contract with the ARL to write a second edition of Nancy Gwinn's _Preservation Microfilming: A Guide for Librarians and Archivists_. ALA has agreed to publish this 2nd ed. (as they did the 1st), and it is due out in 1995, with the writing to be finished in the next month. Now it is time to think about photos for this 2nd edition, and I am asking DistList subscribers to help on this. Those of you familiar with the 1st edition will note that most of the photos came from just a couple of sources. I would like to offer a bit more variety in this new edition. I urge you to consider submitting photos for use in the 2nd edition. In the *terribly* long text below, I provide general guidelines for photo submissions, then a quite specific desiderata list for photos organized according to the book chapters, and finally a list of some graphics/figures that we could use. I am quite aware that this book has assumed a place in the core canon of preservation literature, and I hope that some of you might actually get excited (even at this season with so many other distractions) by the idea of contributing to the new edition. Therefore, the photo wish-list is pretty flexible, so that you might either submit existing photos or actually take photos designed according to our needs. At the end of the file, there is a list of a few figures that we also need; if you have internal documents that might be used or adapted, I would appreciate receiving copies of those. To provide maximum latitude, I have identified a very large number of photographs that could be used, but the list will be winnowed down (depending on what we receive) to under 40 photos in the published edition. Please send photos directly to me: Lisa L. Fox 840 Rosedale Avenue Atlanta, GA 30312-3626 To be assured consideration, they should reach me by December 21, 1994. General Guidelines * only black and white photographs can be used * need good tonal contrast; you might try taking each shot at a couple of different exposures, and we will select the ones that will reproduce best * try to have a mix of men and women, young and old, ethnicity, etc. * of those items with text visible, we hope to have some non-English language materials * all photographs will be credited to the institution/organization or photographer * provide label/credit information on a post-it note attached to the back of the print, so that I will (a) know how to use it and (b) be able to credit the photographer/institution * also on the back of the photo, indicate which Chapter and image number (from the following list) the photo might fit Introduction a. Photo like the one on page xx, but updated to include the key resources now, e.g., ANSI IT9.1, 9.2, and MS23, the two RLG manuals, AACR2, etc. b. A scanning station c. Person at a microfilm reader using a text. Caption will note that these resources are critical for future research and will highlight the need for good quality in the film to overcome/reduce user resistance. Chapter 1: Overview of Administrative Decisions a. A lovely but deteriorated (brittle, broken pages in gutter, edges breaking, etc.) text, either book or manuscript, preferably the sort of item that readers might recognize (i.e., a well known title or document, manuscript from a well known person, etc.) , illustrating something that might need to be filmed particularly to protect the original b. Meeting of a group of library/archives staff. Caption will note the importance of involving all affected units in planning a microfilming project. c. Broad overview shot of a microfilming unit in a library or archives d. The various microformats: 105mm roll microfilm on reel, 35mm roll microfilm with acid-free paper/string tie, 16mm roll microfilm, single-exposure microfiche for cartographic materials, standard 98-frame 105mm microfiche, jacketed microfilm. May retain the photo on page 6, but I would prefer to have it focus more closely on (and better show) the film media, without the boxes at the bottom. e. Photo in the stacks showing a range of books that could require preservation attention including filming f. Work area set up for collation and preparation, preferably with a person working on a volume or folder. The photo on page 16 may be used, but I would prefer one that better illustrates a workstation set up for efficiency (e.g., with flags, etc. positioned nearby and perhaps an irregularities target or instruction sheet on the work surface. (Besides, I hate having that coffee cup in the photo.) g. A photo of people meeting to discuss a cooperative filming project. Among other options, this could be a photo from one of the RLG, CIC, or SOLINET project managers meetings, or maybe from the meetings NEH has been holding in November/December. Chapter 2: Selection a. Two people (identified as a selector/curator or faculty member and preservation officer or filming project manager) standing in front of a range of books that have been pulled for potential inclusion in a filming project. Perhaps one of them could be holding the book and they could be supposedly discussing whether or not it is an appropriate candidate. b. Person in the stacks doing a condition survey c. Bound volume with a binding so tight it could require disbinding d. Volume (maybe even a scrapbook) open to a page with one or more photographs. Caption would point out that items with photographs may require use of continuous tone filming and/or special handling. e. Group of publications laid out on a table, to include the various scholarly statements that have been developed under the Commission on Preservation and Access, such as those of the MLA, jewelry people, historians, etc. f. A group of obviously brittle archival materials, newspapers, letterpress books, obviously fading mimeograph/thermofax, etc. g. A book, newspaper, or archival item so brittle that it will obviously crumble in the filming process h. Something that would qualify as an "artist's book" i. Individual shots of items that would pose a problem in filming -- e.g., brittle book or newspaper so badly discolored that there is little contrast between text and paper, manuscript with advanced iron gall ink deterioration (requiring use of a black background so letters are discernible), etc. j. Manuscript with high intrinsic/artifactual value--preferably an item that would be truly compelling, whose author and/or recipient as well as topic would be well known to most readers k.person at a terminal doing online replacement searching l. Person at a work station doing replacement searching in hard-copy source(s) m. Set-up shot: a reel of microfilm, a group of illustrations (having been removed from a volume), and an alkaline envelope or other enclosure in which those illustrations will be placed. Caption will explain that if you have color illustrations or others that don't film well, you may retain them in hard copy form. Chapter 3: Production Planning & Preparation a. Photographs of the various ways of dealing with tight bindings: a volume being guillotined (to replace the photo on page 42), complete disbinding, removing covers, dividing the volume into smaller sections, cutting selected sewing threads b. A client meeting with filming agency staff during a site visit, perhaps grouped around a camera, in the inspection area, etc. c.overview photo of a filming area, to fill the same function as the photo on page 152, but that one is not very useful since it focuses more on the partitions than on the work areas d. Overview photo of a technical inspection station, with densitometer, microscope, light box and rewinds, loupe (close-up photos of these may be used in Chapter 4) e. Photo of the filming sample prepared for shipment to prospective service bureaus? Not sure if this is feasible, for it needs to support some caption regarding the importance of preparing a truly representative sample, and I don't know how much a photograph can convey along those lines. f. Person using a barcode reader to track items going through the filming process g. Person collating a volume with non-Arabic pagination. This will need to be a close-up shot clearly showing the page(s). h. Large item or volume with large fold-outs that may require sectionalized filming i. Photographs of flattening procedures. The 1st edition included (pages 74 and 75) ironing pages and misting. Ironing will not be illustrated in the new edition and I would prefer not to illustrate misting. It would be appropriate to show small scale humidification (as outlined in the Ritzenthaler manual) or the kind of large scale humidification NARA has done for tri-folded records. j. Grouping loose newspaper clippings on a "carrier sheet" (along the lines discussed on page 76 of the 1st edition) k. Open scrapbook showing some of the filming challenges these might present: e.g., overlapping newspaper clippings, layers of photographs, multicolored items, multipaged pamphlets, etc. l. Staff member preparing targets. Perhaps show the person working at the terminal, with an eye-legible target coming out of the printer. I am inclined not to re-use the photos on page 18, as both are now outdated. Chapter 4: Microfilming Practices & Standards a. Key microfilming standards, specs, guidelines laid out on a table so you can see most if not all their covers. Include MS23, IT9.1, the two RLG manuals, etc. b. Step-and-repeat camera--if possible, making it clear how sheets are automatically fed through. c. MRD2--perhaps one with and one without a book cradle d. Close-up of the voltage meter on the MRD2 e. Hermann & Kraemer camera, somehow showing how it is attached to the PC as a "driver"--perhaps one with and one without a book cradle Note: The camera photographs should have people in them, but focus on the camera itself, and there should be materials on the copyboard or cradle as if the camera were actually in use. The area around the camera should be clean and uncluttered. f. Microfilm jacket, close-up. This may not capture well on film, in which case it may be preferable to provide a diagram of one. g. Two people at a planetary camera, as if one were training the other h. Camera operator carefully turning the pages of a brittle book (or bound newspaper), to replace the photograph on page 98 that does not have good contrast and detail i. Close view of a book on a book cradle. May re-use the one on page 107. j. Frame counter in use k. Deep tank processor, with the tank covers off so one can readily see how the film passes through each tank, and showing film in the drying chamber. The one on page 109 is not good, because it only shows the drying chamber. l. Tabletop processor. We can reuse the one on page 109, if it still exists, unless we can get another (for some reason better) one. m. Master negative being inspected with a loupe over a light box, replacing the photo on page 128, which doesn't show the rewinds and doesn't have enough tonal contrast for the light box to be visible n. Ultrasonic splicer o. Scientific microscope and stand microscope p. Transmission densitometer q. Inspection station, like the photo on page 111, but less cluttered and with a better (closer?) view of the set-up r. Close-up of a microfilm reader showing the glass plates positioned so they do not risk abrading the film during inspection s. Person using a microfilm reader for bibliographic inspection, clearly showing the image being displayed. The photo on page 19 could suffice for this, as it does have the kind of close-up detail I want, but I would prefer a less dark/murky image. t. Microfilm storage vault. It is possible to retain the one on page 121, but it does not give a very good overall view of the vault. It might be good to have two photos, one of the sort of vault at NUS, and another of a small institutional vault for print master storage. u.a photograph (of the sort I seem to recall seeing from NUS or similar companies) showing the corridors/hallways with little golf carts running around v. Outdoor shot of a purported "archival" storage facility located right by a busy expressway? The text talks about what a challenge this can be for providing decent air quality. I have in mind a photograph that would show the busy expressway (preferably filled with cars at rush hour) and the storage company right over, under, or beside it. w. Various microfilm boxes, combination of plastic and paper x. various microfilm reels, combination of metal and plastic, showing good and bad designs y. Various fiche envelopes, preferable showing the position of the seams, to accompany the text that talks about the dangers of adhesive and seams Chapter 5: Bibliographic Control a. User searching an OPAC for a title that may exist in microform b. Hard-copy version of the multiple volumes of NRMM, alongside an RLIN or OCLC terminal where it is accessible online. Caption will say something about the enhancements of searching tools we now have. c. Set-up shot showing the key tools for bib control, e.g., AACR2, the OCLC and RLIN input guides, Henson's AMC guide d. Cataloger's workstation with a book truck of microfilm to be cataloged Chapter 6: Cost Controls a. Set-up shot showing NEH and NHPRC guidelines Figures, Tables, and Other Illustrative Materials a. Preservation decision flow chart (to replace Figure 2 on page 39). It may be possible simply to revise Wes's chart, but I would like to see other institutions' and organizations' materials. b. Search form for monographs (to replace Figure 3 on pages 42-43) c. Search form for serials (to replace Figure 4 on pages 44-45) d. Screen printout of an internal tracking program like the University of Florida's "FILMLOG" e. Filming Agent Quality Control Report Form (as in Figure 17, page 113), perhaps using the RLG model f. Library Quality Control Report Form (as in Figure 18, page 129), perhaps using the RLG model *** Conservation DistList Instance 8:44 Distributed: Thursday, December 8, 1994 Message Id: cdl-8-44-008 ***Received on Wednesday, 7 December, 1994