Subject: Conservation nomenclature
Clare Hills-Nova <hillsnov [at] is__nyu__edu> writes >I felt I should jump in immediately on the >definition of the term Cultural property. Is there a particular reason >why the adjective "ethnographic" is not used? ... Has this term been >superseded? Is it non-p.c.? I can not think of any reason "ethnographic" would be considered non-"PC". However, I must say that all of the PC discussion happening in the colleges and universities today is the McCarthyism of the 90's. Thanks, **** Moderator's comments: Fair notice: while discussions of the politics of language *as it pertains to conservation* are very welcome, this thread will not be allowed to generic political discussion. Craig Deller *** Conservation DistList Instance 8:85 Distributed: Sunday, April 23, 1995 Message Id: cdl-8-85-004 ***Received on Monday, 17 April, 1995