Subject: Lamination equipment
John Grace <jgrace [at] archives__ca> writes >I am looking for a manufacturer of a laminator to be used for >heat-set mounting of oversize paper records. The equipment must >perform a two-stage process: heating the object between platens (4 >by 5 feet), then passing the object through rollers to exert >pressure and ensure a bond. Is John Grace really, really, very sure that he *wants* to do this? I work at the fonds of the "Barrow method," and my teeth are set on edge every time I hear the terms "laminator," "heat-set," or "records" used in the same context. There has been a lot of dancing around the topic, but I think that the Pennsylvania State Archives' recent announcement of the Pew Charitable Trust grant to "de-Barrow" quantities of records is the final recognition of the fact that lamination was a terrible idea, a disaster of enormous proportion, and a big mistake. I suppose the reticence has come less from a desire to shield Barrow's reputation than those of all the archivists who bought into it. Henry Grunder *** Conservation DistList Instance 9:17 Distributed: Thursday, August 17, 1995 Message Id: cdl-9-17-005 ***Received on Tuesday, 15 August, 1995