Subject: Ethics and materials
In response to the inquiry of Simon Hogg regarding the ethics of advising artists on materials, I suggest that this is not so much an ethics concern but one of responsibility. I strongly believe that it is our responsibility as conservators to instruct/advise artists on what we know about the longevity of the materials they might be using or might consider using. The problem, more often than not, is that most of the artists that I have met are simply not interested in such information, nor are many of the art instruction programs. On the other hand, I have enjoyed many associations with artists who are concerned about materials and have expended the time and effort (and occasionally fees) to seek my help with both specific and general concerns. Whenever I give presentations to the public, particularly when I expect attendance by artists or art faculty, I discuss the issue of materials selection. I believe that conservation concerns should be taught routinely in art schools, but I expect to wait a long time before this is prevalent. We can not force artists to take our advice, or even to listen to us, so it is not an ethical question for us. The ethics issues are for the artists, providing that we are willing to provide them with the information. Part of our professional responsibility is public education and the public includes the artists. Geoffrey Brown Kelsey Museum University of Michigan *** Conservation DistList Instance 9:33 Distributed: Tuesday, October 10, 1995 Message Id: cdl-9-33-010 ***Received on Monday, 9 October, 1995