Subject: Ethics and materials
Simon Hogg <s.hogg [at] ic__ac__uk> asks a very pertinent question : >If one knows, as a conservator, that a certain material is likely to >degrade in a certain time period, is it ethical (or indeed is it an >appropriate question,) to advise an artist not to use certain >materials. The answer must be yes. Similarly it is the conservator's job to advise the custodian or archivist if materials used to protect an item are equally of an inferior quality. The problem with artists seems to be their never ending vocation to seek themes new, unusual and essentially bizarre. Just this week I heard of an artist who was looking for a suitable waxed paper that could be put into in a photo copier. The artist wanted to transfer an image by the copier onto the waxed paper and in turn transfer by pressure the image onto a canvas. Both the canvas and the waxed paper forming part of the artists work. Even more bizarre was the fact that the artist was after a material of particular specification: it seems he had been made aware of that most meaningless description of the 20th century--acid-free--and the waxed paper must be so inclined. This type of problem is a dilemma and one Museum custodians and those responsible for the conservation of future collections must surely be aware particularly. In an ideal environment one would have thought the artist would rather be notified of the significance of using one type of inferior material over another if future works of art are to be on open display rather than stuck for preservation reasons in an airless container, freezer or darkened cell. It seems that the more bizarre the art form the more chance it has of reaching the publics view, for better or worse custodians eager to promote new themes appear less interested in the ethics of future preservation. Mark Vine Conservation Resources *** Conservation DistList Instance 9:33 Distributed: Tuesday, October 10, 1995 Message Id: cdl-9-33-011 ***Received on Friday, 6 October, 1995