Subject: Dust cloths
Tom Brown <tomb [at] hawaii__edu> >Our building manager asked me if there are any recommended treated >cleaning cloths that can be used for wiping books. There are 3 commercially available dust cloths appropriate for use in libraries and archives. They don't leave a residue behind, are lint free, and yet the cloths attract and hold dust. 1. One Wipe Dust Cloth by Guardsman (the furniture polish makers) is a yellow flannel chemically treated cloth. It can be hand washed in cold water and a small amount of mild detergent (such as LUX) up to 10 times. By then it will have lost its enhanced dust-holding properties. The manufacturer claims 20 washes but I've not found that to be the case in over 20 years of use. Cost about $3.50 each. These cloths can be purchased in most hardware stores and food markets as well as most of the library and archival catalogues. 2. Stretch 'n Dust by Johnson & Johnson Advanced Materials, New Brunswick, N.J., is a disposable chemically treated cloth, yellow with light orange dots. The cloth was developed by Chicopee Products which was recently purchased by J&J. To increase the dust-holding capacity, one gently stretches the cloth prior to use. It comes in packages of 20 cloths, 23"x24", #0414, 20 packages to the case, $126/case. This works out to around $.32 each. I suggest calling 1-800-835-2449 for the nearest distributor. 3. There is a third cloth recently available--Dust Bunny, a Tyvek and nylon cloth that has a slight electrostatic charge with no chemical treatment. They are about 16" square and white. They can be washed in a washing machine with a mild detergent and seem to last forever. However they currently cost about $5 each. Dust Bunny is available from Light Impressions, University Products and Gaylord. Both One Wipe and Stretch 'n Dust have been okayed for use in libraries and archives by L.C. and the National Archives. Neither leave a residue on books, boxes or shelves. However after prolonged use the user's hands feel sticky since some of the chemical comes off on one's hands and then dust adheres to the fingers. Stretch 'n Dust is more economical for large scale dusting projects. And since they are disposable they would be a better choice for use in environments where mold might be present. However I like to use Dust Bunny in our book repair shop and in the archives because they are softer and one's hands stay cleaner. Michaelle Biddle Wesleyan University Library Middletown, CT *** Conservation DistList Instance 10:43 Distributed: Thursday, October 31, 1996 Message Id: cdl-10-43-008 ***Received on Tuesday, 29 October, 1996