Subject: Cellulose ethers
Re Tom Stone's study of the longevity of cellulose adhesives: I have heard previously of his findings on baskets that had been repaired with methyl cellulose before and am still puzzled about it. When I started using methyl cellulose (I hesitate to say how long ago!) I tried it for different purposes and never could make it stick two things together. As a sort of sizing agent for powdery pigments or powdery wood it was just wonderful, but the only situation where I could ever use it for sticking thick paint or pigment layers to a substrate was when the layer softened in water and at least partly restuck itself. In short, I am amazed that anyone could make these repairs work even the first time. I think it is vital to make it absolutely clear that what we might call an adhesive failure is a matter of the material's appropriate use. This is the equivalent of what happens when conservators use Acryloid B-72 as a moisture barrier. The failure of this as a tactic is not a failure of B-72 but a failure of the conservator to understand its properties. Under many circumstances I despise using aqueous emulsions, but for basketry repairs with Tengujo tissue fibers, I often use very dilute emulsion because it seems strong enough to last, even though as a material it is not the best. In addition, the ease of wetting and subsequent removal of the repairs is aided by the presence of the fibers, which somewhat mitigates what I find objectionable about emulsions. The bottom line is that a "better" material does not create a "better" treatment if the material is not appropriate for the particular use. *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:63 Distributed: Friday, January 23, 1998 Message Id: cdl-11-63-001 ***Received on Wednesday, 21 January, 1998