Subject: Polyvinyl alcohol
I would like to lend my support to Lisa Mibach's call for some methodical research into the properties of modern PVOH, with a view to making recommendations in respect of its use in conservation. I do not share her optimism that it is any more 'reversible' than previously. We have been using PVOH (as described in my previous postings and in CoOL) for a while now as an alternative to PVAcetate adhesive for use in making archival quality boxes. The principal benefit (apart from ease of manufacture from powder to aqueous adhesive, good adhesive properties and cost-efficiency) is that it contains almost no residual acidity through decay and release of acetic acid. When making so many archival enclosures for an institution such as ours (a medium-sized archive service), I prefer not to place a steadily accumulating problem of acetic off-gassing into our repositories and, by extension, prefer not to use an acidic decaying adhesive for packaging photographic materials for instance. In this context, the apparent stability of PVOH is very helpful. We never use PVOH for remedial conservation. In our tests we have found that PVOH can be softened with cold water after it has been used as an aqueous adhesive and subsequently allowed to dry, but we have not been able to dissolve it, except in hot water. Thus we do not use it to treat archives. Since we have no requirement to reverse our boxes however, this is not an issue for us. In conclusion, it is a little alarmist to say that one should stay "far, far away" from using PVOH in a preservation context. It has uses in the way I have described, even if it should not be used for remedial treatment because it is not readily reversible. *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:76 Distributed: Wednesday, March 11, 1998 Message Id: cdl-11-76-006 ***Received on Monday, 9 March, 1998