Subject: Soot on wall painting
Re: "Chemical" Sponges About 15 years ago there was interest among ethnographic conservators in finding a conservation-quality material to remove surface dirt from rough-surfaced traditionally-tanned skin clothing. (During original use these items were usually cleaned by abrasion with sandstone or a chalky stone, much as we once cleaned "white buck" shoes.) Cornmeal was often used by restorers, but we were concerned about possible pest problems from residues, and looked at a range of erasers, powdered erasers, "chemical sponges" and so forth. I believe that some good work was done on this at CCI but I do not remember the specifics, and hope that others can fill in. At any rate, I do seem to recall that the eraser crumbs (which seemed promisingly effective) left microscopic particles of rubber embedded in the surface fibers in spite of careful vacuuming and brushing. We were concerned about the eventual effects of sulphur liberated by these vulcanized particles. I don't know if this is relevant in the case of paintings or paper, but perhaps someone could provide more precise information. Lisa Mibach *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:48 Distributed: Monday, November 30, 1998 Message Id: cdl-12-48-007 ***Received on Sunday, 29 November, 1998