Subject: Humidifying nitrogen for anoxic treatment
Will Jeffers asked whether it was necessary to humidify the nitrogen flush in a nondynamic Ageless fumigation of a Japanese folding screen. My off-the-cuff opinion is that humidification may not be necessary, but buffering may be a wise precaution if the object contains lots of air or is RH sensitive. The final RH in a microenvironment for *passive* anoxia using Ageless will be the cumulative result of a) the amount of dry gas used for purging plus the RH of whatever residual ambient atmosphere was not purged, b) the amount of moisture (EMC) in the object being treated, and c) the moisture given off by the Ageless sachet when the exothermic reaction warms its internal humectant. Since, in a tight bag, a hygroscopic object will usually have a much greater capacity for moisture than the surrounding air, the object should be expected to "self-buffer" the microenvironment fairly well. (This is of course not the case in an active system with constant gas purging). Also, since Ageless may elevate the RH depending on the rate of its reaction (more O2 = more heat = more moisture), dryer initial conditions may be safer. Especially since anoxia depends on dessication for its efficacy, and a high RH may be ineffective. What all this means is that too dry may not be a problem, but too humid could be. For this reason, the presence of excess dunnage (wood, paper, cloth, silica gel...) is recommended. *** Conservation DistList Instance 13:39 Distributed: Monday, January 10, 2000 Message Id: cdl-13-39-002 ***Received on Wednesday, 5 January, 2000