Subject: Storing photographic materials
In response to the discussion on non-buffered vs. buffered interleaving tissue for use in photo albums, we did some testing here at Northwestern. In accordance to accepted practice we purchased non-buffered interleaving tissue about 5 years ago to use in photo albums. One album in particular had come down to the Lab for structural repair. The photos I believe are silver gelatin prints. The photos were in good condition with some fading. One of the reasons we decided to place an interleaving tissue in between each page was because the photos were mounted both on the recto and verso sides of the pages and were touching each other when the album was closed. Yesterday I went to retrieve the album and pH tested the tissue. The result was a reading of 3.2-3-5. We still have the original roll of tissue and the reading on that came out to 6.0 pH. I also took readings of the support pages both from one that didn't have a tissue facing it and the other that did, both readings came out at 3.7 pH. My question is what would be recommended at this point: remove the tissue and replace with buffered tissue or just remove and leave well enough alone? We have other photo albums that will be coming to the Lab in the near future for structural treatment so once again would interleaving be an appropriate action? Deborah Howe / Collections Conservator Northwestern University Library 1935 Sheridan Road Evanston Il 60208 847-491-7607 *** Conservation DistList Instance 13:44 Distributed: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 Message Id: cdl-13-44-013 ***Received on Friday, 11 February, 2000