Subject: Insulated modular storage without environmental controls
Paula Sagerman <redfish [at] together__net> writes >The Brattleboro Historical Society (VT, USA) would like to use part >of an old barn for storage of archival materials if there is a way >to protect the materials from deterioration. We have paper, >textiles, furniture, etc. In order to protect the building >envelope, we are considering building a "box within a box" using >insulated, sheet-rocked walls and ceiling. However, there will not >be any climate control. Are any materials safe in this situation? Our strongrooms are in a brick-built basement in England, much more temperate and better insulated than a barn in Vermont, but I have noticed one feature which might be relevant to your collections: the capacity for cellulose-based materials to buffer their own environment. One of our strongrooms was originally half-empty, with a small humidistat-regulated dehumidifier in residence, and (depending on where we took our RH readings) we got quite a wide variation. The next strongroom has no dehumidifier, but is packed full, and our hygrometers always read between 55% and 62%. On several occasions, however, I've noticed that some of the boxes near the end wall felt perceptibly cool. This suggests that the archives themselves are 'taking up the slack,' and that our readings are misleading for preservation purposes. They condition the whole room--quite a different problem from pocket microclimates where a box can feel normal on the corridor side and be actually damp where it nudges a condensing wall. Might it be useful to acquire a set of readings in the empty barn, and then compare them with a similar set, taken at the same seasons, when the barn is full? It could show how much the material is actually affecting/affected by its environment. *** Conservation DistList Instance 13:45 Distributed: Friday, February 25, 2000 Message Id: cdl-13-45-012 ***Received on Thursday, 17 February, 2000