Subject: Light traps
Kory Berrett <kory [at] juno__com> writes >... a client of mine with an IPM >program in place was advised by their pest control contractor to >consider the purchase and deployment of light traps in their new >collections storage building. The part of the building in question >houses farm tools, gross functional objects, and a few horse drawn >vehicles. The traps use low wattage UV lamps as their lure. You >can look at one maker's line by visiting <URL:http://www.wmmg.com>, >Whitmire Micro-Gen. I guess I had dismissed UV attractants out of >hand for the obvious reasons, but here are my questions. Has anyone >seen these put to use in any museum setting? Has anyone evaluated >these devices on a risk vs. benefit basis? Is there a possibility >of deploying these devices, mitigating against the worst light >damage with filters, and still realizing the benefits of the trap? I've been using a Spinsect light trap at the Museum of Fine Arts for the past two years. The Spinsect trap, available through McMaster-Carr (Cat #7027T1), uses a 22-Watt ultraviolet bulb in combination with a small fan, to attract insects and funnel them into a plastic bag, placed downstream from the fan. I don't use this trap as a preventive measure, but instead deploy it as part of an IPM action plan for particular infestations. For instance, last year we began to see large numbers of adult dermestid beetles in a certain part of our museum. The infestation was traced to a dead pigeon that had been inadvertently sealed into the ductwork of an exhaust system. After replacing the offending section of ductwork, and running the exhaust system to help draw the adult dermestids out of the building, we placed the Spinsect trap near a fume hood from which the adult dermestids were emerging, and ran it at night for a couple of weeks. By the end of two weeks, we were no longer seeing adult dermestids in the trap, and discontinued its use. While the trap was being used, care was taken to ensure that light-sensitive collections were not in danger of exposure to UV. Light-sensitive materials were either covered, or removed from the immediate area when the trap was in use. Similarly, I've used the Spinsect trap as part of an IPM strategy to control mosquitoes in one of our basement areas. In this instance, a source of standing water was located and eliminated, and the Spinsect was used to trap adult mosquitoes. The Spinsect was placed in a hallway near the source of the mosquitoes, and pointed towards the wall to reduce the risk of unacceptable UV exposure to adjacent collections. I wouldn't imagine that a UV filter would be a good idea on this type of trap, as the UV source is what is attracting the insects. Instead, I'd recommend thoughtful deployment of a UV trap. Another thing to consider is the biology of museum pests. Consider that most, if not all, of the pests we encounter are damaging in their larval form. A light trap, while quite successful at catching phototropic adults, does nothing to attract larvae, or to interrupt damaging larval feeding. To indiscriminately use a UV trap may not provide any benefit in terms of pest management, and may actually prove to be a detriment, by attracting additional adult pests to the area. Will Jeffers Collections Care Specialist Department of Scientific Research Museum of Fine Arts 465 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02115 USA 617-369-3466 Fax: 617-369-3702 *** Conservation DistList Instance 14:32 Distributed: Thursday, December 7, 2000 Message Id: cdl-14-32-003 ***Received on Thursday, 30 November, 2000