Subject: Conservation of archaeological composite object
Robert Lodge <mckaylodge [at] aol__com> writes >In Cons DistList 15:31, Karin Abelskamp inquired about alternative >methods not involving heating for removing chlorides from a Roman >iron/wood composite object. This is not my field of expertise. >However, a product common in the realm of industrial protective >coatings that I have used to remove surface-reacted-surface-attached >chlorides (and sulfates) from steel prior to coating is Chlor-rid. >It bonds with the ions and rinses free with water. No residues are >left according to independent testing. For information on the >product, how it works, test kits, and a brief on salts contamination >go to <URL:http://www.chlor-rid.com/>. Perhaps it will be useful for >the iron. I would be concerned about using the product (Chlor-rid) mentioned below on archaeological iron. The Chlor-rid company notes (please see their web page) that their product is intended to remove soluble salts from surfaces to improve the bonding of surface treatments. Soluble chlorides on the surface of archaeological iron would be removed by almost any washing method commonly applied (eg, alkaline soaks, soxhlet extraction), but the longer term problem is the chlorides loosely bound in the corrosion products themselves. I don't know how effective Chlor-rid would be in reducing or solubilizing these minerals, or in penetrating the micro cracks and pores where the chloride corrosion cycle typically takes place. In response to Ms Abelskamp's original question about the iron/wood composite object, the typical treatments for waterlogged wood and chloride contaminated iron are not compatible. While it is possible to treat wood and iron together, both components usually suffer some degradation from the other's treatment (e.g., high pH baths will degrade the wood, and PEG is corrosive to iron), and neither treatment is ever completely satisfactory. So if the object can be disassembled (and reassembled again after treatment) without loss of it's archaeological significance, I would do so, and treat the components separately. Howard Wellman Maryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory *** Conservation DistList Instance 15:33 Distributed: Friday, October 19, 2001 Message Id: cdl-15-33-002 ***Received on Thursday, 18 October, 2001