Subject: Deterioration of polyurethane sculptural relief panels
I have corresponded with Scott Williams from CCI, who specializes in the deterioration of plastics. Scott has come up with a theory about the deterioration of the Jim Dine panels. He specifies that until he knows the composition of the panels, though, this is just conjecture. I will send Scott samples for analysis. Also, I am hoping Scott will visit CCA in a few months--a follow-up visit to a couple of days he spent here in November analysing plastics in other collections--so he will see the panels himself. With Scott's permission I present his theory, as patched together from a couple of e-mail messages: There are only a few plastics that can be moulded around objects in a studio--polyester, epoxy, polyurethane, acrylic. None of these are known to be responsive to moisture fluctuations, so it is unlikely that it is changes of moisture content in the plastic that is causing problems. Nor do I think it is a question of expired life expectancy. It is more likely that something happened during the move from Chicago to Montreal. Perhaps transport loosened the bond between plywood base/back and plastic to a sufficient extent that dimensional changes in the wood due to moisture changes are now sufficient to break plywood/plastic bond, allowing warping of the plastic which was previously constrained by adhesion to the plywood, leading to cracking throughout. (Scott was assuming the plastic was adhered, not mechanically fastened, to the plywood. I need to look closely at the panels to try to determine how the layers are bonded, but when I told him that at one corner of one panel I see what appears to be the head of a nail, painted over, he replied that "the same kind of sudden cracking and warping could just as easily occur if attachment at a nail was broken as if an adhesive bond had released. In either case there would be a loss of attachment and a loss of constraint in the plane of the plywood, which could result in damage as I suggest.) If the plastic developed stresses over time but was still firmly adhered to the plywood, it would remain flat and not show any signs of the stress. If the bond between plastic and plywood broke, then the plastic would warp or crack in response to the stress. This would in turn lead to new stresses and/or cracks in all other layers. Your measurements indicate no further damage from when you did your initial measurements. This is as I would expect. The whole thing snapped all at once, relieving stress by cracking and warping. No stresses remained to cause more cracking and warping. I think the damage you have observed is physical damage, perhaps caused by chemical changes in the plastic since it was made, but not by chemical changes since it was shipped. Therefore, you do not need to worry about arresting chemical change. You must worry about stabilizing the physical environment. You want to avoid temperature and RH fluctuations in the object, especially in the plywood, not so much in the plastic. The plastic is probably quite insensitive to RH and temperature. Your environmental controls provide stable RH and temp so you are ok there. Do not wrap them to seal them up. This will provide no benefit and may result in them stewing in their own juices. I think the best thing you can do now is not disturb them. (In a subsequent note Scott stressed the importance of identifying the plastic, though, because it is possible that something may turn up that suggests things are changing more quickly than he suspects.) If they are flexible, you will need to figure out how to move them without flexing the plastic/plywood bond. This validity of this explanation rests on determining whether the plastic/plywood bond has failed. If you are going to do anything I would try to resolve this issue. Look for wood attached to detached pieces of plastic and warping where thin sections of the plastics meet the wood. Scott Williams *** Conservation DistList Instance 15:49 Distributed: Saturday, January 12, 2002 Message Id: cdl-15-49-003 ***Received on Tuesday, 8 January, 2002