Subject: Provisions for maintenance in contracts for public art
Rebecca A. Rushfield <wittert [at] juno__com> writes >Having become involved in a situation in which a site-specific >sculpture on a college campus is in need of conservation work, but >there are no funds available to perform that work, I wondered if >anyone on the Distlist has knowledge of any case in which a >provision for maintenance funds was included in either the original >contract for a commissioned work of public art or in the acceptance >agreement for a donation of an outdoor sculpture or other public >work to an institution. Like many conservators, I became involved in my local community Art Commission and helped them to see the importance of considering conservation issues when reviewing donations or commissions of public art works and of having provisions for the care and maintenance (along with guidelines) included, to resolve as many funding issues as possible, prior to any acceptance by the city governing body. Once the governing body had been made aware of risks/liabilities and cost benefit analysis it was obvious to them that it was in the best interest of the city to have such provisions. I'm aware of several cities where this is now the standard procedure. V. Montana Ryan Assistant Professor for Paintings Conservation *** Conservation DistList Instance 15:60 Distributed: Tuesday, March 5, 2002 Message Id: cdl-15-60-004 ***Received on Wednesday, 27 February, 2002