Subject: Photographic collections and particulates
I wonder whether you are able to help me by your own experience or research, or by pointing me in a direction where I may find advice. I am the collection manager for English Heritage's National Monuments Record, a collection of about 10 million photographs of England's Archaeological and Architectural heritage. Our purpose built Archive which was completed about 8 years ago has stable environmental conditions maintained by computer controlled Building Management Systems. The environment of our negative store is currently set for 8 deg. C and 32% RH giving us a preservation factor of about x10. The air handling units which feed the vaults have particle, dust and carbon filters. When needed the photographs, glass plate negatives, film negatives and prints are removed from the relevant vaults, pass through acclimatisation procedures, if necessary, and are taken to the work and viewing areas. We have just learnt about a planning application which has been submitted to site a aggregate distribution centre on the land adjacent to our Archive's main air intakes, some heaps of aggregate, stone, or sand etc could be as close as 25-30 meters. Have you any experience of how dust and airborne contaminants from these piles of stones might effect us? Obviously our filters will need careful monitoring and probably far more frequent renewal, but how will the dust which inevitably will creep through the system or enter our work and public viewing areas, which are not air conditioned and rely on open windows in the summer for ventilation, effect our photographs. One reads in all the good literature on photographic preservation about keeping photographs in stable environments, away from light and dust but I have not seen any reasons given why away from dust. Of course there are the obvious ones which I have thought of already; 1. Dust on negatives make them difficult to print properly without blemishes and spots. 2. If the dust is gritty then the surface of the emulsion could get scratched. 3. Some enclosures and film bases can become electrically charged attracting more dust and making the situation worse. That's where I run out of ideas. If we are to make a good case to stop this aggregate store or move it further away from our archive I will need more than this. Can you help ? Tony Rumsey Collections Manager National Monuments Record English Heritage *** Conservation DistList Instance 15:80 Distributed: Friday, May 24, 2002 Message Id: cdl-15-80-007 ***Received on Thursday, 23 May, 2002