Subject: Soot and odour removal after a fire
Reni Teygeler <rene.teygeler [at] wxs__nl> writes >Does anyone have any experience in removing soot and the pungent >odour from monographs after they have been recovered from a fire? This is little more than speculation, but intuition suggests that a low pressure atmosphere might be conducive to odour reduction for fire damaged materials. Zeolites are in common use in conservation, they are sometimes used for cleaning poultices on stonework and are present in the white version of a range of absorptive papers and boards used in the archive/museum world. The other material employed is activated charcoal. My understanding is that these materials form molecular traps. This is fine once the material to be removed is free of the object, but how to encourage it to leave? By their nature, the chemical species which we can smell are volatile. If the surrounding pressure is reduced, the relative vapour pressure of the volatiles increases. This provides the required gradient. By the use of molecular traps and flushing a low pressure chamber with new air it might be possible to expedite the process of deodourisation. Low pressure (not vacuum) bagging might be an easier and cheaper low volume alternative. If brushes are being used to remove smoke particles, it is wise to use an industrial type downdraught table which exhausts via either a HEPA (0.3 micron) filter or to the outside air. At the very least use a vacuum cleaner with a HEPA filter and a mask. After gross cleaning with brushes etc, use a cleaning putty which will remove particles without re-distributing them. I have heard of lavender oil being suggested to mask unpleasant smells; a cover up job? Ozone is highly oxidising and toxic. Oxidisation is one of the main mechanisms of decay, need one say more? Mark Hingley Conservation Section Norfolk Record Office Norwich England *** Conservation DistList Instance 16:19 Distributed: Thursday, September 12, 2002 Message Id: cdl-16-19-005 ***Received on Monday, 9 September, 2002