Subject: Storing acidic paper
Deborah Rohan <deborah.rohan [at] cambridgeshire__gov__uk> writes >Does anyone have opinions on acid-free versus non acid-free >packaging for already acidic documents? ... My initial comment would be that there are many types of acidity and many other agents that can damage paper. Papers in a collection may well be acidic but this may be in a relatively innocuous form. For example I have no doubt that most of the gelatin sized papers in the Hayle Mill archives have a pH below 5 but nevertheless nearly all of them are in excellent condition. (Surprisingly even machine made commercial manifold paper used for copies of correspondence from the 1930s is in good condition (apart from mouse or insect damage) despite often being in a poor storage environment for many years. However the sort of storage folders you might buy that are not of conservation quality could cause damage. When I get a chance I will put the collection in quality folders and boxes which should also offer some protection from atmospheric pollution. (I have to admit though it i not high on my priority list!). On a cautionary note though, a lot of so called acid free papers certainly were not when I tested them years ago. "Acid free tissue" was often acidic! This may have changed but I think you need to be absolutely sure what you are getting. Furthermore a paper can be acid free but contain many other harmful impurities. I suspect this will be interesting correspondence and I am looking forward to a diversity of views! Simon *** Conservation DistList Instance 16:27 Distributed: Thursday, October 10, 2002 Message Id: cdl-16-27-005 ***Received on Thursday, 10 October, 2002