Subject: Certification
I commend and support the efforts made by the AIC to develop a Code of Ethics and to keep tackling the issue of certification. It is in the nature of any body of knowledge once a critical mass has been reached to question what defines it. In the conservation profession there appears to be a general agreement that a need for some type of organization and standardization of this body of knowledge has arisen. Regarding certification the following questions arose for me: What is the umbrella under which different schools of thought may co-exist? What is the least common denominator that can be found and still be viable? What is the role of the AIC? If it is spearheading attempts at coming to grips with a growing body of knowledge and the proliferation of levels of conservation activities I am full-heartedly in support of these attempts. Refer to Bylaws of the AIC, Section I: Purposes 1; 2 <URL:http://aic.stanford.edu/pubs/bylaws.html> However if certification is tied to being a dues paying member of the AIC I would consider it a limiting, exclusive and in no way binding effort and in the end counter productive. My reading of point 3 of the Bylaws would support the notion that ultimately certification should take place outside of the AIC in the attempt to move certification towards being generally accepted and binding. Already alluded to in point 2f of the Bylaws, the Code of Ethics and Guidelines for Practice need to find expression in guidelines accepted by federal, state and local government agencies which would provide a basis which would be binding for schools which seek accreditation. To pull all these aspects together and to become an established profession is a daunting task. I believe that everything is constantly developing. We create rules in the attempt to chart a course. We make the rules it is up to us to break them, what are we afraid of? Gudrun Aurand Bookbinder/Conservator (self-professed) Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164-5610 *** Conservation DistList Instance 16:39 Distributed: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 Message Id: cdl-16-39-022 ***Received on Tuesday, 10 December, 2002