Subject: Gouache Public discussion and offline responses
As I had suspected, the interesting discussion happen off-line! My recent query about dealing with stiff curled paint on a large gouache painting yielded, so far, seven e-mails and two phone calls. (See Conservation DistList Instance: 18:30 Monday, January 10, 2005) The suggestions included various ways of using moisture combined with heat and/or solvents, and suggested adhesives. So I got a lot of helpful advice--but no one else who might have similar problems got anything at all. Which leaves me, again, regretting that all the interesting stuff happens off-line. Is everyone *so* self-conscious that they won't post on-line?! All the comments were certainly helpful to me--I can't imagine that anyone would criticize. **** Moderator's comments: I could not agree more! I hope all DistList participants will take your comments to heart. The point of this forum is not to spark private discussions from which the rest of the community draws no benefit, but to foster wide exchange of views and information so that all conservation professionals may share in the knowledge that grows from informed discourse. I have been told by many participants that they they respond offline far more often than they do online. While some have had good reasons for doing so (e.g. protecting client or institutional confidentiality), many have said (a) "I thought that was what we were supposed to do" or (b) "I didn't think others would be interested". Well, if what you have to say is worth the trouble of responding to an author, it is most likely worth sharing with the rest of us. I will amend the instruction document sent to new participants to make this clear. Thank you, Barbara, for saying so well something that has bothered me for a terribly long time. Barbara Appelbaum Appelbaum and Himmelstein 444 Central Park West New York, NY 10025 212-666-4630 Fax: 212-316-1039 *** Conservation DistList Instance 18:33 Distributed: Sunday, January 23, 2005 Message Id: cdl-18-33-001 ***Received on Tuesday, 18 January, 2005