Subject: Early phenol-formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde plastics
James Tapley <jthandbook [at] aol__com> writes >I have acquired a badly damaged (cracks, losses) art deco Reliure >Jotau industrial molded "Bakelite" bookbinding. While these bindings >are always referred to as made of Bakelite I believe, based on the >unpainted but rather colorful plastic, that they are perhaps made of >a urea-formaldehyde plastic. Can anyone suggest a relatively simple >and non-destructive test for distinguishing between urea- and >phenol-formaldehyde plastics? ... In response to James Tapley's request for a simple test for distinguishing between a urea and phenolic plastic bookbinding: Scrape a ground glass slide across an inconspicuous area of the book cover e.g. a corner or edge. This will give a line of sample on the slide suitable for two or three spot tests but causes minimal damage to the artefact. (Thanks to France Remillard for this technique). Apply a tiny drop of 5% diphenylamine solution in 90% aqueous sulphuric acid to the sample on the slide. (Note: Very concentrated acid! Refer CCI notes 17/2 Williams, "The Diphenylamine test for cellulose nitrate" for a slightly different version of this spot test.) Cast phenolic resin will give a magenta pink stain, the depth of colour will depend on the amount of sample on the slide. The test works only on the colourful, cast phenolics, not on the heavily filled, dark, industrial phenolics which were manufactured by a different process. The same test will give an instant very dark blue stain on cellulose nitrate samples and a blue-green colour on many other plastics including most urea and melamine formaldehydes. However the blue-green is not diagnostic for those plastics because it appears to be a response to additives rather than the polymers. Julia Fenn Royal Ontario Museum *** Conservation DistList Instance 18:36 Distributed: Sunday, January 30, 2005 Message Id: cdl-18-36-019 ***Received on Wednesday, 26 January, 2005