Subject: Triton
Gregory D. Smith <smithgd [at] buffalostate__edu> >It is true that Dow announced back in March of 2004 that it would be >ceasing production of Triton XL-80N because of low demand. More on the History of Triton XL-80N: Triton XL-80N was formulated as an ecologically friendly replacement for Triton X-100 by Dow Chemical. The product was introduced to the conservation profession by the late Doug Adams of Conservation Materials, Ltd. Upon his suggestion, I evaluated a sample and wrote a Technical Exchange submission for the January 1995 WAAC Newsletter <URL:http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/waac/wn/wn17/wn17-1/wn17-104.html> summarizing the technical specifications for both X-100 and XL-80N. A Replacement for the Replacement: Scott Blair of Conservation Support Systems has found a replacement for Triton XL-80N. Like XL-80N it is an alkoxylated linear alcohol. The MSDS lists JL-80X's composition as consisting of 100% C10-C12 alcohols, ethoxylated, propoxylated while XL-80N is based on C8-C10 alcohols ethoxylated, propoxylated. Comparing physical properties: X100 XL-80N Surfonic JL-80X ---- ------ --------------- HLB 13.5 12-13 13.1 CMC .015% .0086% not characterized approxate MW 624 442 603 spec. gravity 1-07 0.98 1.007 viscosity 25C 240 cP 25 cP 51 cst In practice, JL-80X is lower in viscosity than XL-80N and dissolves more readily in water than either X-100 or XL-80N. As is the case for both X-100 and XL-80N, JL-80X makes a wonderfully stable water-in-oil emulsion of 90% mineral spirits, 9.5% water and 0.5% surfactant. The slightly longer length carbon chain in JL-80X, would, I imagine, make it a more versatile detergent for greasy materials. Chris Stavroudis Paintings Conservator in Private Practice 1272 N. Flores Street Los Angeles, CA 90069-2904 323-654-8748 *** Conservation DistList Instance 19:21 Distributed: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 Message Id: cdl-19-21-004 ***Received on Sunday, 16 October, 2005