Subject: Temperature control
We were asked for a advice concerning climatization in a planned new art gallery in south western Germany. The top floor (intended for old master pieces as well as contemporary art) is glazed with a sort of translucent lantern heavily exposed to the sun. According to the engineers, the HVAC-System is designed to work at a constant temperature of 20 deg. C and constant relative humidity of 55%. The system will work fine at this setpoint up to an outdoor temperature of 26 deg. C. But on very hot days the outdoor temperature will be well above 26 deg. C and the museum is urged to run its galleries theoretically at higher indoor temperature up to a maximum of 26 deg. C (outdoor 32 deg. C, which according to German building standards is supposed to be the maximum temperature for this region). The question is how quick the temperature should be allowed to rise within short periods (hours/day). Assuming that the climate control won't break down ;-) : what is the difference in risk between keeping the temperature down to 20 deg. C as long as possible and then having a sharp increase vs. rising the temperature over a longer time period following the outdoor temperature. We think that keeping the temperature low allows for less increase in chemical damage rate, whereas a steep increase might cause physical problems within an art object (expansion). Is that correct? If so: which risk are we to take more serious? As the rising temperature at constant RH means that the amount of absolute humidity is rising considerably, will this cause significant problems at the envisioned temperature of 26 deg. C? (moisture content, water activity, mold?) We would welcome any input. Due to the tight time frame of this project we welcome quick offline answers which we will summarize and post to the list after christmas. Joachim Huber and Karin von Lerber Prevart GmbH Oberseenerstrasse 93 CH-8405 Winterthur +41 52 233 12 54 Fax: +41 52 233 12 57 *** Conservation DistList Instance 19:29 Distributed: Tuesday, December 6, 2005 Message Id: cdl-19-29-025 ***Received on Monday, 5 December, 2005