Subject: Storing photographs
Ian Marsh <ian [at] tlframing__co__uk> writes >We generally use an unbuffered museum board for photographs. Does >anybody know if there is a definitive list of which processes are >most suited to this environment, and which processes would benefit >from being in standard buffered museum boards, if any? There is no definitive list of which photographic processes are most suited to unbuffered enclosure materials because there is no evidence that buffered enclosures are harmful. The "list" often includes cyanotypes, chromogenic prints, dye transfer prints, and albumen prints. The issue of alkaline materials affecting albumen prints was first raised in the early 1980s by James Reilly based on his research at RIT. By 1984, and after further testing, Reilly retracted his initial statement that alkaline buffering in enclosure materials is deleterious to albumen prints. There has been no research since then to suggest otherwise. The other processes have made it on the list based on theoretical speculation. For example, it is well-known that a cyanotype will undergo fading by alkaline hydrolysis when placed in an alkaline solution. Dye transfer and chromogenic prints can also be negatively affected by such treatment. However, it has not been demonstrated that the alkali reserve used in buffered enclosures has any negative effect upon any of the photographic processes. There is some concern that in a disaster involving water, the alkali reserve from the enclosure could raise the pH of the water in which a print is immersed. Based on such considerations, some have chosen to "play it safe" and use unbuffered enclosure materials for cyanotypes, and less frequently, for other processes as well. Gawain Weaver Andrew W. Mellon Fellow Advanced Residency Program in Photograph Conservation George Eastman House *** Conservation DistList Instance 19:53 Distributed: Sunday, April 30, 2006 Message Id: cdl-19-53-001 ***Received on Sunday, 30 April, 2006