Subject: Lacquered papier mache tabletop
Ruaidhri O'Bolguidhir <ruri [at] eircom__net> writes >The varnish on the surface is very stubborn and solvent tests >carried out have shown that dichloromethane is the only effective >solvent. Even dichloromethane is difficult to use because it >evaporates so quickly. Does anyone know of a way to gel >dichloromethane which would allow me to apply it to the surface with >more control? In North America, you can obtain dichloromethane already gelled with paraffin, prepared at a commercial scale and thus available in cans, as "Polystrippa", a carcinogenic and poisonous, but very effective, paint remover sold in every hardware store. Over here, the active chemical is usually called methylene chloride, but the two names describe exactly the same chemical, a methane base with two chlorine atoms substituted for two hydrogen ones, that is, CH2CL2. It works dangerously fast, and is also just plain dangerously toxic. As well, it doesn't offer a strong scent, so there is no odour warning before you've overdosed, which leads to heart attacks. But, if you work carefully and with particularly good control of ventilation, perhaps you will be able to use it. Think ahead: A few thousand swabs later, you'll want your health to remain intact. Mind that there are plenty of other slower, weaker, and perhaps less poisonous chemicals to use to swell, soften, and remove paint or varnish. Talk to the paintings conservators, as they seem to be the ones with the most experience dealing with recalcitrant varnish. When we furniture conservators deal with varnish, for the most part the varnish is sitting on top of wood, a material reasonably resistant to damage from solvents, except of course to that ubiquitous, relatively non-toxic, and carbon-free solvent, water. If the only material that shifts your varnish is dichloromethane, to me that signals that the varnish has polymerized. If it has polymerized, then you are not going to be able to 'reactivate' the varnish, like you might be able to do with a 'spirit' varnish. The chemistry of the varnish has changed since it was applied, exactly what you would expect from an "oil" varnish, and your solvent tests have revealed precisely that. I hope to hear from the DistList that, in fact, someone has discovered how to soften, remove the obscuring dirt from, re-amalgamate, and flow out to a smooth, transparent, piano finish, the wide range of disgustingly dirty old ruined finishes that one may see on old furniture. Please do speak up if you have that news. But unless I hear differently, I think the case is that, barring a wonderful new discovery in the world of chemistry--something we could all hope for--'de-polymerization' that could lead to re-amalgation of the original finish is not yet possible. If you are determined to remove the obscuring darkness of a polymerized varnish film, I imagine your remaining options are to soften and remove it chemically, if cautiously, or slowly grind through it to the design layer. We were recently considering what to do with a very dark, almost opaque varnish over wood. We cleaned the surface, hoping for a big improvement in the ability to see the veneer beneath, but cleaning had almost no effect on transparency. All that happened was that the surface was revealed to be shiny and reflective, once cleaned. Our finish was quite transparent, not pigmented, but still very dark. We had samples of the finish analyzed and discovered that the material was made of linseed oil and colophony, that is, pine resin, with no trace of particles indicating the inclusion of pigment. Perhaps your analysis will reveal to you that you have a similar resin mix on your table. We had the luxury of being able to justify leaving the film in place, and that is what we did, but I don't foresee that route as being one of your options. There's your challenge, eh? Best wishes. James Hay Senior Conservator Furniture and Decorative Arts Canadian Conservation Institute Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0M5 Canada *** Conservation DistList Instance 20:26 Distributed: Monday, November 13, 2006 Message Id: cdl-20-26-002 ***Received on Thursday, 9 November, 2006