Subject: Recrystallizing naphthalene on natural history specimens
Erin Chapman <erchapman75 [at] yahoo__com__au> writes >My minor thesis topic is the preparation, storage, and care of the >Queensland Museum's Bat Collection. The bats in the Queensland >Museum collection were collected to be used for research purposes, >and as such, are not used for display within the museum. A large >number of the bats exhibit a white crystalline powder on the outer >surface of their skin, particularly around the legs and wings. The >substance does not seem to be deleterious to the specimens. >Preliminary examination and research into this problem indicates >that the substance is more likely to be a re-crystallisation of >naphthalene. Re-crystallized naphthalene is fairly common on dry biological specimens in U.S. collections. A simple melting point test can be helpful in confirming that the material is naphthalene. It's low melting point is not shared by most other pesticides or other preservatives likely to have been used in the past. If it is necessary to remove the crystals, either because they obscure details or because the 'mothball' odor is objectionable, gentle heat (about 80 deg. F) coupled with good ventilation will help. If the material is truly naphthalene, use appropriate health and safety precautions during the decontamination process. Catharine Hawks Conservator 2419 Barbour Road Falls Church VA 22043-3026 USA *** Conservation DistList Instance 20:33 Distributed: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 Message Id: cdl-20-33-002 ***Received on Tuesday, 19 December, 2006