Subject: Ultrasonic and pneumatic nebulizers for mist consolidation
Julie Dennin Ream <julieream [at] comcast__net> writes >From time to time I am asked to advise colleagues on the purchase of >equipment for use in mist consolidation projects. ... > >... I would be interested in a >dialogue surrounding the equipment conservators have chosen and how >it has impacted their experiences in treatment. There are more and >more devices on the medical market now--are the more expensive ones >really worth it? Please respond to the list. We purchased a Maymed Aquilon nebulizer about a year ago in order to consolidate some friable/cracking ink drawings. (Code S MAY 8460, from Mayo Healthcare Pty Ltd; $AU380 incl. 10% GST. See <URL:http://www.mayohealthcare.com.au/index.html>). Specifications are as follows, in case they are of use: Voltage: 240VAC, 50Hz Power absorbed: 60 watts Max Pressure: >350kpa Flow: >15Lpm Dynamic pressure: >180kpa Flow: @8Lpm Weight: 3kg The Aquilon is marketed as being appropriate for heavy duty use and for multiple users. (Its real use is for patients suffering from cystic fibrosis etc). I had a chat with a sales representative and after explaining the type of things we wanted to use it for, she thought that the heavy duty motor would be the most appropriate - i.e. to use with our slightly viscous solutions and for extended periods. We had a play with one before we bought it and it seemed to work OK, using the medication holder that comes with the machine. (This only holds 10mls of solution; but I found that after that runs out it's time for a break anyway). I guess if considering a cheaper model you would need to consider the power of the motor, and whether it is appropriate for the viscosity and molecule size of your planned consolidant and the length of time you plan to use it for - I think nebulizers don't cope so well with substances composed of larger molecules, but I'm not sure about this. I've used our nebulizer with weak solutions of methyl cellulose and with 0.5% gelatin which both worked fine; the treatment of the drawings was successful at any rate. My impression is that the mist generated is not quite as fine as that generated by an ultrasonic set-up (which I think is expected); also it comes out at some velocity, unlike an ultrasonic mist which seems more gentle, so I held the nozzle further away from the surface than you might ordinarily. I did have to fiddle around (i.e. retrofit) with different widths/lengths of tubing etc to get a good flow--there was a tendency for the consolidant to condense inside the tube before it got out the other end if the tube was too narrow or long, and I still had to watch out for drips. I set up a little clamp/stand to keep the medication holder upright, and tried different ways of making the end of the tube finer. Someone cleverer than me would be able to retrofit the system in a much neater and more permanent manner, but it did work. It still seemed easier to manage than the ultrasonic set-up, but someone more familiar with this method than I am might beg to differ. I also think my 0.5% gelatin was becoming a bit thicker as the treatment went on, but this was just a "feeling" and not based on any real measurement. The machine's also a bit noisy, but not too bad. Re heating the consolidant, the solution in the container did feel a bit warm after all that nebulizing, but my understanding is that the temperature of any solvent or consolidant applied to a surface is negated almost immediately by the temperature of the object itself and the surrounding air. So I would imagine heating would only be of benefit at the beginning, in order to make a consolidant less viscous, or if you were somehow able to heat the whole shebang, e.g. when items are consolidated inside a humidification chamber to aid flow etc. Alice Cannon Paper Conservator Conservation State Library of Victoria 328 Swanston Street Melbourne, Victoria 3000 +61 3 8664 7331 Fax: +61 3 9639 6559 *** Conservation DistList Instance 21:10 Distributed: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 Message Id: cdl-21-10-004 ***Received on Tuesday, 12 June, 2007