Subject: Photographic light box works
We have several photographic light box works in our collection here at Auckland Art Gallery that I would welcome advice on. A typical design consists of a photographic transparency such as a Cibatrans print on polyester film sandwiched between two pieces of Perspex e.g. 2mm in front and 4mm thickness behind. This is held in the front of a metal box containing fluorescent strip lights, the actual design varying with each one depending on the artist. When switched on they make a striking display--but from a conservation point of view, the combination of colour photograph with heat and lots of light is not a happy one. All the works are showing problems with the photographic transparency cockling and sagging in-between the Perspex. This distortion is not especially noticeable when the work is illuminated but in some cases there are mottled patterns caused where the two surfaces touch. Some modifications have been attempted in the past with clamping the Perspex more tightly together but this seems to have made little difference. In one set of works the distortion was so bad soon after it was acquired that, under suggestion of the artist, the transparencies were reprinted and laminated to Perspex and a matte PVC film was put over the top using water based acrylic adhesive. So far these works look good, although I do worry that as Perspex expands more than polyester with heat there may be problems with adhesion in the future. Have other institutions experienced similar problems with cockling of transparencies in light boxes? Any good solutions? I'm not considering laminating existing transparencies but this might be an option if at some point they can be reprinted. There is also the problem of light fading and setting reasonable guidelines for how long they can be displayed. Do other institutions have a policy on this type of work? As with other modern photos in most cases we don't know the actual type of photographic process or support used to get an accurate life estimate (an issue we are trying to tackle at the acquisition stage but meeting resistance). I would welcome any input from fellow conservators on how to best prolong the life of these works. Becky Cameron Conservator, Paper Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tamaki Auckland New Zealand *** Conservation DistList Instance 21:14 Distributed: Tuesday, July 3, 2007 Message Id: cdl-21-14-014 ***Received on Friday, 22 June, 2007