Subject: Recycled paper
I work for a large government archive and am charged with the job of advising government agencies on what types of paper to use when creating records. Our current advice to agencies is that all records required for retention periods of greater than 10 years should not be created on recycled paper. The trouble is that government agencies are being encouraged to use recycled paper wherever possible--in fact for pretty much everything. The other trouble appears to be that recycled papers are now beginning to comply with ISO 9706 for Permanent Paper. In the eyes of many agencies this weakens our argument not to use them, even though there is still some question about the durability of recycled papers and their consequent archival quality. I am interested to hear what papers other archives are recommending for the creation of records, and what retention periods are used as a cut off for "permanent" records. In particular--do you think we could allow the use of recycled paper for longer retention periods--i.e change from less than 10 to less than 30 years? Personally I think we could, but I'd like to get a more general consensus prior to making any changes. And if a recycled paper complies with ISO 9706--should this mean that it can be used for the creation of permanently retained archives? Elizabeth Hadlow Senior Conservator State Records NSW Department of Commerce *** Conservation DistList Instance 21:21 Distributed: Tuesday, September 4, 2007 Message Id: cdl-21-21-024 ***Received on Thursday, 16 August, 2007