Subject: Stamp pad ink
Alan P. van Dyke <alan [at] mail__utexas__edu> writes >We are toying with the idea of using rubber stamps on collection >material folders during our archives processing. ... > >... I have found two products: Ranger Archival Ink Stamp Pads, >available at a number of art suppliers, and Archival Stamp Pad Ink, >available from Conservation Resources. ... Generally file folders are highly calendared and the inks which are considered safe (ones that are pigments, not dyes) will smear on them, sometimes even when dry, which is one more argument for using pencil (which passes the PAT, I might add). I have tested both of the inks you mentioned, and a number more, not for file folders, but for stamps required by declassification regulations. While the University Products ink you mentioned tested to be a good ink, it is, or when we tested it was, a pigment suspended in water, and it stayed on the stamp, so that only a few stampings could be made before it was "gunked up". The other product, the Ranger Stamp Pad Ink in black, is an ink which tested acceptable for marking paper. However when the photoactivity test was run, this ink failed, so it should not be used in any collection where photographs might be interfiled. Susan Lee-Bechtold Chemist *** Conservation DistList Instance 21:26 Distributed: Sunday, October 14, 2007 Message Id: cdl-21-26-002 ***Received on Sunday, 30 September, 2007